2008
DOI: 10.2136/sssaj2007.0111n
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method to Determine Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity in Living and Undecomposed Sphagnum Moss

Abstract: All rights reserved. No part of this periodical may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Permission for printing and for reprinting the material contained herein has been obtained by the publisher.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
100
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
100
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The parameter values of the moss layer for water and energy properties were derived from a number of recent experiments measuring the hydraulic properties of mosses (Price et al, 2008;Price and Whittington, 2010;McCarter and Price, 2012) (Table 1). Living mosses range from 2-3 to over 5 cm in height (Rice et al, 2008) and have lower values of dry bulk density and field capacity than fibric peat (Price et al, 2008).…”
Section: Soil Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The parameter values of the moss layer for water and energy properties were derived from a number of recent experiments measuring the hydraulic properties of mosses (Price et al, 2008;Price and Whittington, 2010;McCarter and Price, 2012) (Table 1). Living mosses range from 2-3 to over 5 cm in height (Rice et al, 2008) and have lower values of dry bulk density and field capacity than fibric peat (Price et al, 2008).…”
Section: Soil Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Living mosses range from 2-3 to over 5 cm in height (Rice et al, 2008) and have lower values of dry bulk density and field capacity than fibric peat (Price et al, 2008). Compared to fibric peat, the saturated hydraulic conductivity of living moss is higher by orders of magnitude (Price et al, 2008) and the thermal conductivity is more affected by the water content (O'Donnell et al, 2009). To fully account for the effect of mosses, we set the depth of the living moss (z m ) within the top soil (i.e.…”
Section: Soil Layersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The saturated hydraulic conductivity and parameters (i.e., α, n, θ sat , and θ r ) for van Genuchten water retention curve (Eq. (10)) were set separately for individual organic layers (Price et al, 2008) (see supplementary material for more details). The saturated hydraulic conductivity (λ sat ), α, m, θ sat , and θ r , for the mineral soil were estimated using ROSETTA based on the soil texture (Schaap et al, 2001).…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some work is underway in Canada. Price et al (2008) designed laboratory apparatus that can measure hydraulic conductivity of the porous material found in peat soils. Levrel et al (this issue) measured hydraulic conductivity from peatland columns sampled in boreal bogs as well as from nearby forests established on partially peaty soils.…”
Section: How Could Hydrological Models Be Improved To Incorporate Peamentioning
confidence: 99%