A Method to Determine the Presence of Averaged Event-Related Fields Using Randomization Tests

Abstract

We present a simple and effective method to test whether an event consistently activates a set of brain electric sources across repeated measurements of event-related scalp field data. These repeated measurements can be single trials, single subject ERPs, or ERPs from different studies. The method considers all sensors simultaneously, but can be applied separately to each time frame or frequency band of the data. This allows limiting the analysis to time periods and frequency bands where there is positive evidence of a consistent relation between the event and some brain electric sources. The test may therefore avoid false conclusions about the data resulting from an inadequate selection of the analysis window and bandpass filter, and permit the exploration of alternate hypotheses when group/condition differences are observed in evoked field data. The test will be called topographic consistency test (TCT). The statistical inference is based on simple randomization techniques. Apart form the methodological introduction, the paper contains a series of simulations testing the statistical power of the method as function of number of sensors and observations, a sample analysis of EEG potentials related to self-initiated finger movements, and Matlab source code to facilitate the implementation. Furthermore a series of measures to control for multiple testing are introduced and applied to the sample data.

EEG microstates as a tool for studying the temporal dynamics of whole-brain neuronal networks: A review

“…In order to do so, the cluster analysis needs to be performed separately and the number of optimal maps needs to be defined independently for each group. Statistical topographic correlation analysis can then be applied to distinguish maps that belong to the same class from those that are specific for a certain group or condition (Koenig et al, 1999;Koenig and Melie-Garcia, 2010;Lehmann et al, 2005;Nishida et al, 2013;Strelets et al, 2003).…”

Does my brain want what my eyes like? – How food liking and choice influence spatio-temporal brain dynamics of food viewing

“…Due to the differing number of epochs per condition, VEP epochs were normalized by the mean instantaneous Global Field Power (GFP) at each sampling point (Lehmann and Skrandies, 1980) during group averaging. GFP is calculated as the square root of the mean of the squared amplitude value recorded at each electrode of the 128-channel montage we used (vs. the average reference and represents the spatial standard deviation of the electric field measured on the head surface (Koenig and Melie-Garcia, 2010).…”

Balanced bilinguals favor lexical processing in their opaque language and conversion system in their shallow language

“…Modulations in the strength of the electric field at the scalp were quantified using global field power (GFP; Koenig & Melie-Garcia, 2010;Lehmann & Skrandies, 1980;Murray, Brunet, & Michel, 2008). GFP is calculated as the standard deviation of the voltages/ potentials measured at each electrode and time point.…”