2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method to assess obstetric outcomes using the 10-Group Classification System: a quantitative descriptive study

Abstract: ObjectivesInternationally, the 10-Group Classification System (TGCS) has been used to report caesarean section rates, but analysis of other outcomes is also recommended. We now aim to present the TGCS as a method to assess outcomes of labour and delivery using routine collection of perinatal information.DesignThis research is a methodological study to describe the use of the TGCS.SettingStavanger University Hospital (SUH), Norway, National Maternity Hospital Dublin, Ireland and Slovenian National Perinatal Dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiparous women whose labour was induced were less likely to have an emergency CS than nulliparous women. Similar ndings were reported in a study using the Ten-Group Classi cation system [46], which compared outcomes for women birthing in three hospitals in Norway, Ireland and Slovenian. The CS rate in group 2 (nulliparous women at term gestation, cephalic presentation, induction of labour) was 25.7% in Norway, 34.4% in Ireland and 30.4% in Slovenia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Multiparous women whose labour was induced were less likely to have an emergency CS than nulliparous women. Similar ndings were reported in a study using the Ten-Group Classi cation system [46], which compared outcomes for women birthing in three hospitals in Norway, Ireland and Slovenian. The CS rate in group 2 (nulliparous women at term gestation, cephalic presentation, induction of labour) was 25.7% in Norway, 34.4% in Ireland and 30.4% in Slovenia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…7,27 In the Icelandic translation of the Apgar score guidelines until 2015, "grimace" was translated as "crying," and thus, the infant needed to cry-not simply to grimace-in order to receive one score for the "response to stimulation" section (private communication). 7,27 In the Icelandic translation of the Apgar score guidelines until 2015, "grimace" was translated as "crying," and thus, the infant needed to cry-not simply to grimace-in order to receive one score for the "response to stimulation" section (private communication).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of low Apgar scores in most Robson groups in our study was somewhat higher than in previous studies. 7,27 In the Icelandic translation of the Apgar score guidelines until 2015, "grimace" was translated as "crying," and thus, the infant needed to cry-not simply to grimace-in order to receive one score for the "response to stimulation" section (private communication). This was corrected in 2015, but this could explain the relatively high proportion of low Apgar scores in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study utilized the descriptive-correlation design. Descriptive research design is a specific method which involves observing and describing the behavior of the participants [6]; it is done without making interference from the investigator [20]; it explores causes of the different frequencies of outcomes and events [21]. In this study, this method was appropriate because the TVE support and learning facilities provided by the school such as the library and internet connectivity; Science laboratory; TVE laboratory; computer and ICT were described according to the assessment of the students.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%