1956
DOI: 10.1007/bf02289088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of scalogram analysis using summary statistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
118
0
1

Year Published

1964
1964
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
118
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the procedure of the earlier scaling studies, the method of Guttman analysis described by Green (1956) was employed. In this method an index of consistency, I, is used to replace the several requirements for scalability proposed by Guttman.…”
Section: Analytic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the procedure of the earlier scaling studies, the method of Guttman analysis described by Green (1956) was employed. In this method an index of consistency, I, is used to replace the several requirements for scalability proposed by Guttman.…”
Section: Analytic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some have advocated methods of scalogram analysis which maximize the fit between the sample data and the scalogram model (cf. Chevan, 1972;White & Saltz, 1957), Green (1956) has pointed out that, when Guttman's model holds, the items must be ranked by difficulty (or popularity) and that little is usually gained by seeking optimal solutions. GSCALE is therefore most appropriately used when a set of items is initially being screened for scalability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each such response is considered a scale error and R =1 -E/NK, where N is the number of subjects, K is the number of items, and E is the total number of scale errors for all subjects. A more detailed description of the error counting procedure is given by Green (1956).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations