1977
DOI: 10.1109/t-pas.1977.32339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of predicting the corona performance of conductor bundles based on cage test results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the IREQ and BPA [11,16], the PWL can be presented in an approximated linear relationship with lg(g max ), lg(n) and lg(d) as:…”
Section: Derivation Of the Pwl Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the IREQ and BPA [11,16], the PWL can be presented in an approximated linear relationship with lg(g max ), lg(n) and lg(d) as:…”
Section: Derivation Of the Pwl Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 1967 and 1971, many tests were performed by the American Electric Power Company to evaluate the corona effects of high-voltage lines, including a single-span overhead test line and test cage; then the AN method was derived to predict the L5 value of AN level (L5 value is the value exceeding 5% of the all-time value in rainy weather) [10]. Trinh and Maruvada from the Institut de Recherche d'Hydro-Québec (IREQ) had measured the AN level of several conductor bundles by using a corona cage in heavy rain conditions, and they had established a semi-theoretical method for predicting AN levels [11,12]. In addition, Electricité de France (EdF) in France [13], Ente Nazionale per L'Energia Elettrica (ENEL) in Italy [14] and the Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry (CRIEPI) in Japan [15] had also proposed their AN formulas which all derived from heavy rain conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, Moreau and Gary [5] fitted the excitation function with corona cage test data, and they also discussed the relationship of RI field strength between the maximum level in heavy rain and the level in dry weather based on different surface states of conductor bundles. Trinh and Maruvada [6][7][8] measured the excitation function values using a high-voltage coupling capacitor between the laboratory ground and bundle conductors, and proposed an excitation function of 1 MHz, which also reached a conclusion that the RI excitation function of the multiconductor bundles having three or more conductors was essentially independent of the number of subconductors. The independence of excitation function with bundle numbers was also discussed in [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between conductor type and subconductor diameter is shown in Table 1. Considering that the conductor spacing has negligible effect on the excitation function [7,14], it is set to be a constant of 400 mm in this paper. The measuring frequency is 0.5 MHz, which is in accordance with direction from CISPR 18 [15], where the measurement frequency is recommended as 0.5 MHz ± 10%, and the rate of artificial heavy rain is ∼18 mm/h.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also worth noticing that, as indicated in Fig. 2, it is possible to have U, = u2 and thus the parameter constraints below equation (10) in the paper should include this lower bound for U, , and not U , > u2 as shown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%