2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10249052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method of Increasing Digital Filter Performance Based on Truncated Multiply-Accumulate Units

Abstract: This paper proposes new digital filter architecture based on a modified multiply-accumulate (MAC) unit architecture called truncated MAC (TMAC), with the aim of increasing the performance of digital filtering. This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the proposed TMAC units and their hardware simulation. Theoretical analysis demonstrated that replacing conventional MAC units with modified TMAC units, as the basis for the implementation of digital filters, can theoretically reduce the filtering time by 29.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The maximum clock frequency of the proposed device is 31.03% -38.46% higher compared with device based on Winograd method [9] and 1.89% -2.94% higher compared to the filter based on MAC [23] units for the case of 8-and 16-bit devices, but 26.21% less for the case of 8-bit devices. Nevertheless, in comparison with the TMAC-based filter architecture in PNS [13] and in RNS [14] the performance of the proposed device is 7.89% -35.59% lower. The number of LUTs occupied by the proposed device is 18.08% -37.27% less compared with the filter based on Winograd method [9], but 3.83 -7.74 times more compared to other reviewed known architectures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The maximum clock frequency of the proposed device is 31.03% -38.46% higher compared with device based on Winograd method [9] and 1.89% -2.94% higher compared to the filter based on MAC [23] units for the case of 8-and 16-bit devices, but 26.21% less for the case of 8-bit devices. Nevertheless, in comparison with the TMAC-based filter architecture in PNS [13] and in RNS [14] the performance of the proposed device is 7.89% -35.59% lower. The number of LUTs occupied by the proposed device is 18.08% -37.27% less compared with the filter based on Winograd method [9], but 3.83 -7.74 times more compared to other reviewed known architectures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, the proposed device architecture has 13.47% -42.04% less delay, and 2.20% -18.03% less area, except for the 8-bit device, which has a 47.38% larger area than the known MAC-based filter architecture [23]. Compared to the known device architecture based on TMAC units with computations in PNS [13] the delay of the proposed device is 20.92% -22.22% less, but the area is 1.56% -53.37% more for 8-and 16-bit devices, and for 32-bit devices, the delay is 12.17% larger, but the area is 18.03% less. The proposed architecture of the 8-bit filter has 2.15% lower latency, but 16-and 32-bit devices have 3.42% -52.52% more delay, compared to the known architecture based on TMAC units with computations in RNS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…В работе [14] авторы предлагают новое устройство умножения с накоплением. Авторы статьи [15] представили новое усеченное устройство умножения с накоплением для реализации цифровых фильтров с конечной импульсной характеристикой.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified