2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method of assessing the energy cost saving from using an effective door closer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the time step size for the differentiation algorithm was set at 10 min, this study counted as effective window behavior only those opening/closing actions with a time interval longer than 10 min from the previous and subsequent actions. We considered a window‐opening angle larger than 15° as “open window” status, because an opening angle smaller than 15° would introduce less than 30% of the airflow that occurs when the window is fully open 14,31 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the time step size for the differentiation algorithm was set at 10 min, this study counted as effective window behavior only those opening/closing actions with a time interval longer than 10 min from the previous and subsequent actions. We considered a window‐opening angle larger than 15° as “open window” status, because an opening angle smaller than 15° would introduce less than 30% of the airflow that occurs when the window is fully open 14,31 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered a window-opening angle larger than 15° as "open window" status, because an opening angle smaller than 15° would introduce less than 30% of the airflow that occurs when the window is fully open. 14,31 (1)…”
Section: Effective Window Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%