2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.07.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for the Removal of Tungsten Carbide Rings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easy to cut soft materials such as copper, gold, silver, plastic [7]. Breaking the rings made of hard alloys such as ceramic and tungsten carbide is easier than cutting them [8]. However, it is necessary to use electric power saws to cut the rings made of very hard alloys such as titanium and steel.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is easy to cut soft materials such as copper, gold, silver, plastic [7]. Breaking the rings made of hard alloys such as ceramic and tungsten carbide is easier than cutting them [8]. However, it is necessary to use electric power saws to cut the rings made of very hard alloys such as titanium and steel.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, these rings have very low flexibility and model studies show that they may be shattered with locking pliers [ 2 , 3 ]. This approach has now been applied clinically to a patient shortly before delivery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2; 3; 4; 5] The pocket is located in the gp41 N-heptad repeat (NHR) trimeric coiled coil (residues 565–581, uniprot entry P04578) and is occupied by C-heptad repeat (CHR) helices (residues 628–635) during the gp41 conformational transition that accompanies fusion. [6] There are over 50 structures that include this pocket in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), and they display a wide variety of side chain conformations depending on the composition of the complexes[7] and even crystal space group. [3; 5] The result is significant variation in shape and electrostatics of the pocket, limiting the accuracy of computational predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%