“…7) agreed well with values of 0-65-0-71 jug. pantothenate/Lipmann unit reported for the pantothenate content of CoA (Lipmann et al 1947;Beinert et at. 1953).…”
I954 cation of the enzyme with an over-all yield of 20 % was effected.3. A purified preparation of the enzyme attacked all three phosphoproteins studied, but had no appreciable action on glycerophosphate or casein phosphopeptone. The enzyme is hence a true phosphoprotein phosphatase, distinct from the acid phosphomonoesterase.4. Optimum enzyme activity was found at pH 6-0 and at a substrate concentration corresponding to about 10,umoles/ml. of casein phosphorus with 0 001 M thioglycollic acid as activator.5. From the activation and inhibition studies it is deduced that sulphydryl and amino groups are essential for the activity of the enzyme. However the enzyme requires no dialysable coenzyme for its activity.The authors wish to thank the University of Madras for the award of a research studentship to one of us (T. A.S.) and for kind permission to publish the results which form part of a thesis approved for the degree of Master of Science.
“…7) agreed well with values of 0-65-0-71 jug. pantothenate/Lipmann unit reported for the pantothenate content of CoA (Lipmann et al 1947;Beinert et at. 1953).…”
I954 cation of the enzyme with an over-all yield of 20 % was effected.3. A purified preparation of the enzyme attacked all three phosphoproteins studied, but had no appreciable action on glycerophosphate or casein phosphopeptone. The enzyme is hence a true phosphoprotein phosphatase, distinct from the acid phosphomonoesterase.4. Optimum enzyme activity was found at pH 6-0 and at a substrate concentration corresponding to about 10,umoles/ml. of casein phosphorus with 0 001 M thioglycollic acid as activator.5. From the activation and inhibition studies it is deduced that sulphydryl and amino groups are essential for the activity of the enzyme. However the enzyme requires no dialysable coenzyme for its activity.The authors wish to thank the University of Madras for the award of a research studentship to one of us (T. A.S.) and for kind permission to publish the results which form part of a thesis approved for the degree of Master of Science.
“…In parallel, these two teams also showed that CoA could be produced and isolated from microbial sources such as Streptomyces fradiae or yeast. , These observations represented an important advance for the study and production of CoA because the starting materials could be readily obtained (since the microorganisms could be grown easily in short time frames). Buyske and co-workers improved their process dramatically when they discovered that CoA could be coprecipitated with glutathione in the presence of cuprous sulfate . Using this strategy, they isolated 133 mg of CoA from 6 kg of dried yeast with a purity of ca.…”
Section: Isolation Of Coenzyme a From Microorganismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buyske and co-workers improved their process dramatically when they discovered that CoA could be coprecipitated with glutathione in the presence of cuprous sulfate. 15 Using this strategy, they isolated 133 mg of CoA from 6 kg of dried yeast with a purity of ca. 26%.…”
The isolation and synthesis of Coenzyme A (CoA) has been an important field since this cofactor was discovered in 1947. CoA plays a central role in human metabolism and is vital in several metabolic pathways including fatty acid transport and degradation as well as the biosynthesis of a wide variety of compounds including fatty acids. The high cost of commercially-available CoA ($2600 / g with >85% purity) has motivated several research groups to find alternatives for its production. The variety of strategies that have been investigated for CoA production can be divided in three categories: isolation from microorganisms, total chemical synthesis and chemoenzymatic synthesis. These approaches provide access to CoA with different efficiencies. For example, direct isolation yields of ~25 mg/kg from dried yeast have been obtained. A variety of microorganisms such as Pseudomonas alkalytica, Sarcina lutea and Brevibacterium ammoniagenes accumulate CoA in their cultures at levels ranging from 0.03 to 115 mg/mL. Total chemical synthesis yields have ranged between 25 and 54% and chemoenzymatic approaches have provided overall yields of ca. 73%. This review covers all published for producing CoA in order to compare their efficiencies, scalabilities and convenience.
“…Preparative quantities of CoASH have been isolated from microbial sources such as bakers' yeast 2,3 or Brevibacterium ammoniagenes IFO 12071. 4,5 Dried cells of wild-type or mutant B. ammoniagenes were subsequently used in chemo-enzymatic routes since they contained all five of the necessary CoASH biosynthetic enzymes.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparative quantities of CoASH have been isolated from microbial sources such as bakers’ yeast , or Brevibacterium ammoniagenes IFO 12071. , Dried cells of wild-type or mutant B. ammoniagenes were subsequently used in chemo-enzymatic routes since they contained all five of the necessary CoASH biosynthetic enzymes. , More recently, enzyme-assisted strategies have been developed by several groups for CoASH and its analogues − based on fundamental biochemical studies by Drueckhammer, , Strauss and Begley, − and Jackowski. − Our route to CoASH was inspired by the work of Strauss and Begley and employs the three-enzyme cascade of the CoASH salvage pathway (Scheme ). All three steps are ATP-dependent, and the proteins from Escherichia coli have been cloned and overexpressed. ,, Initial phosphorylation of 1 by pantetheine kinase (PanK) yields 2 , whose adenylation by phosphopantetheine adenyltransferase (PPAT) provides dephospho-CoA 3 .…”
We have developed a chemoenzymatic route to coenzyme A (CoASH) and its disulfide that is amenable to gram-scale synthesis using standard laboratory equipment. By synthesizing the symmetrical disulfide of pantetheine (pantethine), we avoided the need to mask the reactive sulfhydryl and also prevented sulfur oxidation by-products. No chromatography is required in our synthetic route to pantethine, which facilitates scale-up. Furthermore, we discovered that all three enzymes of the CoASH salvage pathway (pantetheine kinase, phosphopantetheine adenyltransferase and dephosphocoenzyme A kinase) accept the disulfide of the natural substrates and functionalize both ends of the molecules. This yields CoA disulfide as the product of the enzymatic cascade, a much more stable form of the cofactor. Free CoASH can be prepared by in situ S-S reduction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.