2009
DOI: 10.5004/dwt.2009.548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for the in-situ determination of the hydraulic conductivity of gravels as used in constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A schematic of the hydraulic profile in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland with flat bottom (no slope) is shown in Figure 2.3. Unfortunately, it is difficult to measure hydraulic conductivity in treatment wetlands (Knowles and Davies, 2009;Knowles et al, 2010;Matos et al, 2017). The hydraulic conductivity of the bed medium is highest at start-up, when the medium is relatively clean, and decreases with time as plant roots, microbial biofilms and chemical precipitates gradually occupy spaces that were initially filled with water.…”
Section: Hf Wetland Momentummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A schematic of the hydraulic profile in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland with flat bottom (no slope) is shown in Figure 2.3. Unfortunately, it is difficult to measure hydraulic conductivity in treatment wetlands (Knowles and Davies, 2009;Knowles et al, 2010;Matos et al, 2017). The hydraulic conductivity of the bed medium is highest at start-up, when the medium is relatively clean, and decreases with time as plant roots, microbial biofilms and chemical precipitates gradually occupy spaces that were initially filled with water.…”
Section: Hf Wetland Momentummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, the VSSF and HSSF CW can be applied to treat relatively weak wastewater such as municipal wastewaters [8,9]. Treatment capacity of VSSF CWs and HSSF CWs are comparatively small due to clogging problems in the pores of media [10].…”
Section: (2012) 9-16 Octobermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The low removal efficiency has been attributed to several reasons, including incomplete understanding of the purification mechanisms (Haberl et al, 2003;Imfeld et al, 2009) and the nonhomogeneous distribution of the porous substrate. This latter leads to poor hydrodynamic behavior of the system, which results from a broad distribution of the hydraulic residence time (HRT) and associated preferential flow paths (Suliman et al, 2005;Knowles et al, 2008;Mena et al, 2008;Ascuntar-Rios et al, 2009). This aspect appears to be critical in particular for HSCWs where the treatment efficiency decreases significantly compared with vertical systems (Matamoros et al, 2007b(Matamoros et al, , 2008.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%