A method for the determination of aldosterone in urine is presented, which includes the following steps: acid hydrolysis and extraction, column chromatography on silica gel, 2 paper chromatographic systems, acetylation, a third paper chromatographic system, and fluorometry directly on the paper using alkaline fluorescence. Data are presented on precision, recovery, duration of acid hydrolysis, acid versus enzymatic hydrolysis, stability of urine samples and normal values.T HE importance of aldosterone in the regulation of water and salt metabolism has made highly desirable the availability of a specific chemical method of reasonable accuracy for its determination. Of the published physico-chemical procedures, at least 2 appear to have the necessary specificity and accuracy, namely, the method of Ayres, Garrod, Simpson and Tait (1) and that of Nowaczynski, Koiw and Genest (2). The method of Nowaczynski and coworkers was set up in our laboratories for routine analyses. One urine specimen was encountered, however, in which substitution of acetylation and the Bush B3 system for the Bush B5 system employed as the third paper in Nowaczynski's method yielded considerably lower results. This led to a study of the method, and the introduction of some modifications of the technic of Nowaczynski which are believed to increase the yield and simplify the quantitation in the final step. Essentially, these modifications consist of (a) an increase in the time of hydrolysis, (b) acetylation and substitution of the Bush B3 system for the Bush B5 system used by Nowaczynski for the final separation of aldosterone on paper, and (c) fluorometric estimation by carrying out the Bush alkaline fluorescence reaction directly on paper, a procedure used by Ayres, Simpson and Tait (3). A detailed description is given of the technics used, with data on reproducibility, effect of varying the time of hydrolysis, recovery of known standards, normal values, and stability of urine samples.