2019
DOI: 10.1109/emr.2019.2928964
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for the Detection of Fake Reviews Based on Temporal Features of Reviews and Comments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, detecting spam reviews is challenging due to the variety of spamming techniques used by spammers; hence, researchers have proposed various approaches for spam review detection (Wu et al, 2018). These techniques are based on ml methods (Albayati and Altamimi, 2019;Liu et al, 2019;Sun et al, 2022) and social network analysis (Liu et al, 2016;Sun et al, 2022). A representative example of the latter is the work by Rathore et al (2021) on fake reviewer group detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, detecting spam reviews is challenging due to the variety of spamming techniques used by spammers; hence, researchers have proposed various approaches for spam review detection (Wu et al, 2018). These techniques are based on ml methods (Albayati and Altamimi, 2019;Liu et al, 2019;Sun et al, 2022) and social network analysis (Liu et al, 2016;Sun et al, 2022). A representative example of the latter is the work by Rathore et al (2021) on fake reviewer group detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be obtained using linguistic and semantic knowledge or style analysis via nlp approaches. User-based profiling focuses on both the demographic and the behavioral activity of the user (Miller et al, 2014;Eshraqi et al, 2015;Liu et al, 2016Liu et al, , 2019Sun et al, 2022). It contemplates demography information, frequency, timing, and content of posts to distinguish legitimate from spammer users.…”
Section: Profiling and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Trust level of the user, activity during the review process, and social and personal behavior of the user need to be analyzed along with textual review for better results. Reviews and comments given to the product have been analyzed for detection of an outlier review in [23]. Another kind of new model for fake review detection is based on the semantic and emotional level of the reviewer as well as the density of reviews, which gives a much better performance than the traditional method, which is based on reviewer info, behavior, and textual review [24].…”
Section: Case Study Through Fake Review Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liu et al [4] introduced a method for identifying fake reviews based on product-related review data. Here, they first extract the product review records to a temporal feature vector and then create an isolation forest algorithm to detect the external reviews by concentrating on the difference between the product review trends to classify the outlier reviews.…”
Section: Temporal Features-based Detection Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the increasing importance of online reviews, the tendency to manipulate customers by posting fake/false reviews has also increased drastically. Many organizations use fake reviews as a tool to boost their product sales, and many use them to drop the value of other organizations [3,4]. These reviews are posted by either a single spammer or a group of spammers hired by an organization/company to manipulate customers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%