Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1978
DOI: 10.1071/rj9780126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for the analysis of piosphere data applicable to range assessment.

Abstract: The logistic growth curve equation of population biology is shown to satisfactorily describe the responses of some vegetation and soil measures as a function of distance out from a watering point. Two of the three parameters of this equation can be readily related to parameters of the herbivore - rangeland ecosystem. The potential use of this equation is explored for the development of a simple, quantitative range assessment method. -

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
43
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
4
43
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study nowhere did the extent of impact on rangeland condition exceed 200 m. The effect of watering points on rangeland condition (assessed solely on herbaceous vegetation) is thus of little importance relative to that of rainfall and the stocking rate of the property. This is in contrast to the effect of watering points on livestock ranches, where larger extents of impact have been measured by Lange (1969), Foran (1980), Andrew & Lange (1986), Tolsma et al (1987), Hanan et al (1991), Perkins & Thomas (1993) and Fusco et al (1995); modelled by Graetz & Ludwig (1978), Pickup (1994) and Jeltsch et al (1997); and reviewed by Andrew (1988). A likely hypothesis for this difference is a difference in behaviour around watering points between indigenous large herbivores and livestock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In this study nowhere did the extent of impact on rangeland condition exceed 200 m. The effect of watering points on rangeland condition (assessed solely on herbaceous vegetation) is thus of little importance relative to that of rainfall and the stocking rate of the property. This is in contrast to the effect of watering points on livestock ranches, where larger extents of impact have been measured by Lange (1969), Foran (1980), Andrew & Lange (1986), Tolsma et al (1987), Hanan et al (1991), Perkins & Thomas (1993) and Fusco et al (1995); modelled by Graetz & Ludwig (1978), Pickup (1994) and Jeltsch et al (1997); and reviewed by Andrew (1988). A likely hypothesis for this difference is a difference in behaviour around watering points between indigenous large herbivores and livestock.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Such point sources of essential resources in the landscape may create radial patterns of habitat use such as the disturbance zones (piospheres) around water sources in dry rangelands (Graetz and Ludwig, 1976;Andrew, 1988;Jeltsch et al, 1997). Central-place foraging theory, an application of the wider optimal foraging theory, describes space-use and foraging patterns by animals that frequently return to a focal place such as a den or a nest (Orians and Pearson, 1979).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lower asymptote describes a distinct zone extending out to between 20 and 250 m from the edge of water points in which only annual, pioneer plants survive. This zone corresponds to the sacrifice area described by Graetz & Ludwig (1978). A transitional zone in which the proportion of perennial plants increases fairly rapidly with increasing distance from water lies beyond the sacrifice area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%