1999
DOI: 10.1177/0049124199027004001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Systematically Observing and Recording Collective Action

Abstract: University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignT his article describes a method for systematically observing and recording collective action within temporary gatherings. Our method uses trained observers, distributed across a gathering, who complete a code sheet during time interval samples. The data collected provide a rich record of collective action across space and time. This method has been used to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
32
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, we use the cut-point of 10,000 participants because this represents a significant number of people at a protest event. Because previous research suggests that protests over 1,000 people are actually quite rare (Schweingruber and McPhail 1999), we feel comfortable in conceptualizing the 10,000 figure as large. This is also a natural cut-point in the protest dataset since there is no clustering in observations around 10,000, allowing us to feel confident that despite problems with estimates of participants, we can have a reasonably high degree of certainty that we have not categorized protest erroneously in one of the two groups.…”
Section: Figure 2 Number and Size Of Protests Over The Immigrant Righmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we use the cut-point of 10,000 participants because this represents a significant number of people at a protest event. Because previous research suggests that protests over 1,000 people are actually quite rare (Schweingruber and McPhail 1999), we feel comfortable in conceptualizing the 10,000 figure as large. This is also a natural cut-point in the protest dataset since there is no clustering in observations around 10,000, allowing us to feel confident that despite problems with estimates of participants, we can have a reasonably high degree of certainty that we have not categorized protest erroneously in one of the two groups.…”
Section: Figure 2 Number and Size Of Protests Over The Immigrant Righmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We later reorganized and reduced the taxonomy to four areas of the human anatomy: face, voice, hands, and legs. We focused on the parallel or convergent directions two or more persons are facing; the sounds (e.g., vocalizations or verbalizations) that two or more persons are voicing; the manipulations (e.g., gesturing, clapping, embracing) in which the hands of two or more persons are engaging; and the leg posture and movement of two or more persons in standing, sitting, walking, kneeling, or lying (McPhail and Schweingruber 1999; Schweingruber and McPhail 1999).…”
Section: Individual and Collective Actions In Gatheringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With funding from the National Science Foundation, John McCarthy and I were able to recruit, train, and deploy a sufficient number of observers to take systematic records over time of large gatherings to generate a picture of the changing configurations of individual and collective action 5 . Details about the training manual (McPhail, Schweingruber, and Berns 1997), training procedures, and deployment of the observers are reported elsewhere (Schweingruber and McPhail 1999). I briefly repeat here how observers were trained to enter their estimates of the proportion of people participating in the elementary forms of collective action (EFCA) and how we constructed our measures of participation reported here.…”
Section: Individual and Collective Actions In Gatheringsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, the sociological realm exhibits some relevant studies. Schweingruber and McPheil in [19] has built a model for characterizing "collective actions-in-common", i.e., actions performed spontaneously by several people in coordination. This study, though not specifically centered on viewers, but rather on various forms of crowd, singles out seven dimensions for the analysis of crowd behavior: orientation (facing), vocalization (producing sounds other than words with mouth), verbalization (uttering words), vertical locomotion (movement of the body over the same point on the ground), horizontal locomotion (movement of the body from one point on the ground to another), gesticulation (meaningful bodily configuration based on fingers, hands, and arms movements mainly), and manipulation (using hands to applaud or to strike, carry, throw, pull, etc.).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%