2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.iot.2019.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for structuring meeting logs using wearable sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This approach allowed collecting nodding recognition of 76.4% and head shaking recognition of 80.0% [ 39 ]. A. Onishi and Terada used the IMU sensor to collect participant’s head movements [ 40 ]. They achieved the recognition of 97.5% in utterance, 52.4% in nodding , and 53.6% for looking around actions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach allowed collecting nodding recognition of 76.4% and head shaking recognition of 80.0% [ 39 ]. A. Onishi and Terada used the IMU sensor to collect participant’s head movements [ 40 ]. They achieved the recognition of 97.5% in utterance, 52.4% in nodding , and 53.6% for looking around actions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of human body postures through wearable devices has become feasible. However, for human activity recognition, single or individual types of sensors have certain limitations ( Mathie et al, 2003 , Cheng and Jhan, 2012 , Ohnishi et al, 2019 , Catal et al, 2015 ). Previous studies have mainly focused on coarse-grained activities such as walking, running, and sitting ( Qiu et al, 2022 ), with relatively fewer studies on complex sports activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the last decades, the advances in consumer-directed wearable biosensing devices have shown that the measurement of egocentric views, cardiac activity, and body movement in the wild is not only possible, but that the general public is open to adopt such technology for everyday monitoring of physical health and activity (e.g., [ 86 , 87 , 88 ]), but also in various professional settings (e.g., [ 89 , 90 , 91 ]). Although such technology has been predominantly developed for adults, its ubiquitousness suggests that similar technologies for infants and young children could be received with a fair degree of openness for researching development in the ‘wild’.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%