2016
DOI: 10.7250/csimq.2016-8.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Software Requirement Volatility Analysis Using QFD

Abstract: Changes of software requirements are inevitable during the development life cycle. Rather than avoiding the circumstance, it is easier to just accept it and find a way to anticipate those changes. This paper proposes a method to analyze the volatility of requirement by using the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) method and the introduced degree of volatility. Customer requirements are deployed to software functions and subsequently to architectural design elements. And then, after determining the potential for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A prototype Dental Risk‐Map (Dental R‐map) to express the need for intervention to address risks and the effectiveness of treatment was created as shown in Table 1. Risk maps (R‐maps) are a method of quantifying risk by using a matrix with the frequency of occurrence on the vertical axis and the extent of the injury on the horizontal axis to express the severity of the risk (Anang et al, 2016; Schiele et al, 2012; Zhao, 2012). They are widely used in economics and industry as visual representations of risky and safe domains, and they allow risks before intervention, the risk‐mitigating effect of the intervention, and postintervention risks to be plotted in the same matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prototype Dental Risk‐Map (Dental R‐map) to express the need for intervention to address risks and the effectiveness of treatment was created as shown in Table 1. Risk maps (R‐maps) are a method of quantifying risk by using a matrix with the frequency of occurrence on the vertical axis and the extent of the injury on the horizontal axis to express the severity of the risk (Anang et al, 2016; Schiele et al, 2012; Zhao, 2012). They are widely used in economics and industry as visual representations of risky and safe domains, and they allow risks before intervention, the risk‐mitigating effect of the intervention, and postintervention risks to be plotted in the same matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%