2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2010.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for producing airborne pollen source inventories: An example of Ambrosia (ragweed) on the Pannonian Plain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
101
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Common ragweed is a pioneer plant that is known to prefer open, disturbed sites (Essl et al 2009) and tends to grow in suitable habitats if two conditions are fulfilled (Skjøth et al 2010): (1) available seeds; (2) soil disturbance. For this reason, major construction works in the Milan area 2000-2013 were examined in order to determine whether changes in land use could be related to the decrease in airborne concentrations of Ambrosia pollen in 2013.…”
Section: Examining Land Use Change In the Milan Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Common ragweed is a pioneer plant that is known to prefer open, disturbed sites (Essl et al 2009) and tends to grow in suitable habitats if two conditions are fulfilled (Skjøth et al 2010): (1) available seeds; (2) soil disturbance. For this reason, major construction works in the Milan area 2000-2013 were examined in order to determine whether changes in land use could be related to the decrease in airborne concentrations of Ambrosia pollen in 2013.…”
Section: Examining Land Use Change In the Milan Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular a few stations with particularly high concentrations protruding from surrounding sites (for example, ITMAGE and ROUSSILLON) have a large impact on the results of validation. We compared our cross validation (eight or nine sites left out each time) with three papers about ragweed pollen source estimation over the Pannonian Plain, France and Austria (Skjøth et al, 2010;Karrer et al, 2015). Their cross validations (one site left out each time) show corresponding correlations of 0.37, 0.25, 0.63 and root mean squared error of 25, 16 and 3 %, respectively.…”
Section: First Guess Simulation and Calibration Of The Ragweed Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The International Association for Aerobiology (IAA) recommends for the samples reading at magnification 400× minimum of 3 longitudinal bands or at least 12 transverse bands or minimum 500 random fields (Jäger et al, 1995). The actual sampling methods (longitudinal, transverse or random) and magnifications may vary between the several national networks but are generally compliant (Jato et al, 2006;Skjøth et al, 2010;García-Mozo et al, 2009;Sofiev et al, 2015;Galán et al, 2014;Thibaudon et al, 2014). We based our study on daily pollen concentrations, although for some stations hourly data are available.…”
Section: Observed Pollen Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations