2017
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2016.2544702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for PLC Implementation of Supervisory Control of Discrete Event Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The header contains (1) the start byte (start), (2) the size in bytes of the data being transmitted (#pl), (3) an acknowledgement identification (ack), (4) the checksum value (cks), ( 5) the command (cmd), and (6) the command parameters (cpr). This is followed by (7) the data and (8) the end byte.…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The header contains (1) the start byte (start), (2) the size in bytes of the data being transmitted (#pl), (3) an acknowledgement identification (ack), (4) the checksum value (cks), ( 5) the command (cmd), and (6) the command parameters (cpr). This is followed by (7) the data and (8) the end byte.…”
Section: Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In later studies, the implementation aspects have gained increasing attention. A large body of work has been concerned with SCT implementations for manufacturing systems [6], [7], which are still commonly equipped with programmable logic controllers (PLC). The implementations on PLCs differ from those on microcontrollers, the latter being the common architecture in swarm robotics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implementation of supervisory control theory (SCT) has been extensively explored in academia [1] [2] [3] [9] [10] [11] [12]. The theory states that by modelling a real system as a discrete event system, a supervisor can be automatically generated that guarantees that "the resulting controlled behaviors do not contradict the behavioral specifications and are nonblocking.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Additionally, "It is quicker to design several small models than one large model." [3] Therefore, to minimize the risk of disconnects and decrease the modelling time required, "the system as a whole must be decomposed into several independent subsystems, each one uniquely associated with a specific piece of equipment" [9]. With the subcomponents modelled, they are recombined using an operation called the "synchronous product", creating a single model called the "plant" that describes the full behaviour of the system.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O projeto do controlador de SEDsé geralmente realizado de duas formas: (i) modela-se o comportamento nãocontrolado do sistema e, após isso, controladores são sintetizados a partir da teoria de controle supervisório, (Vieira et al, 2017) e; (ii) projeto do controlador a partir do comportamento desejado do sistema, usando por exemplo, RPICs (Moreira & Basilio, 2014). O uso de modelos como RPICs e sua composição para o controle de uma planta pode resultar em uma explosão do espaço de estados para sistemas complexos que envolvem muitos componentes (Iordache et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified