2008
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrd.2007.916106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Placement of DG Units in Distribution Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
177
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 348 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
177
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter includes biomass, wind, solar photovoltaic (PV) and ocean-based power plants. From the utilities' perspective, DG units can bring multiple technical benefits to distribution systems such as loss reduction, voltage profile improvement, voltage stability enhancement, network upgrade deferral and reliability while supplying energy sales as a primary purpose [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In addition, DG units can participate into the competitive market to provide ancillary services such as spinning reserve, voltage regulation, reactive power support and frequency control [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter includes biomass, wind, solar photovoltaic (PV) and ocean-based power plants. From the utilities' perspective, DG units can bring multiple technical benefits to distribution systems such as loss reduction, voltage profile improvement, voltage stability enhancement, network upgrade deferral and reliability while supplying energy sales as a primary purpose [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In addition, DG units can participate into the competitive market to provide ancillary services such as spinning reserve, voltage regulation, reactive power support and frequency control [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in recent years, due to shar-ply increased loads and the demand for higher system security, DG allocation for voltage stability at the distribution system level has attracted the interest of some recent research efforts. For instance, DG units are located and sized using different methods: iterative techniques based on Continuous Power Flow (CPF) [8] and a hybrid of model analysis and CPF [28], power stability index-based method [29], numerical approach [30,31], simulated annealing algorithm [32] and PSO [33][34][35]. However, the cost-benefit analyses of DG planning have been ignored in the works presented above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To do this, different technical, economical and environmental issues have been taken into account such as voltage stability improvement [2], investment deferral in network capacity [3], active loss reduction [4], reliability improvement, network security [5], emission reduction [6], system restoration [7] and load modeling [8]. The reported models for DG planning can be categorized based on four main attributes as follows:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new methodology based on nodal pricing is proposed in [9] for optimally allocating DG units in order to reduce losses and voltage profile improvement. In [10], a method for placement of distributed generation (DG) units in distribution networks has been presented based on the analysis of power flow continuation and determination of most sensitive buses to voltage collapse. The objective function is to improve the voltage profile and reduction of power losses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying these methods change the multi objective function into a benefit to cost ratio index [14] or an additive utility function [7][8][9][10][11][12][13], [15][16][17] (using a predefined set of weight factors) and then it is tried to maximize (minimize) the constructed single objective problem. The weighted sum approaches cannot guarantee to find all Pareto optimal solutions in the case of non-convex objective spaces [18,19].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%