2011
DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2011.05.100052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Method for Obtaining an Unbiased Sample of Family Medicine Patients for Research Purposes

Abstract: Introduction: Obtaining a representative patient sample for research purposes can be challenging. Classic probability sampling can be trusted, but these approaches are not always feasible; yet alternatives may introduce bias. We summarize relevant literature, the need for new approaches, and illustrate a practical hybrid approach that could consistently produce representative patient samples.Methods: Valid approaches shift sampling decisions from fallible interviewers to less fallible reproducible processes. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…14 The research assistant selected a patient according to time of the scheduled appointment (15 min or 45 min past the hour on Tuesdays and Thursdays, and on the hour or half hour on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays). If more than one patient shared an appointment time, the research assistant chose the person to be interviewed based on the position of their last name in the alphabet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The research assistant selected a patient according to time of the scheduled appointment (15 min or 45 min past the hour on Tuesdays and Thursdays, and on the hour or half hour on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays). If more than one patient shared an appointment time, the research assistant chose the person to be interviewed based on the position of their last name in the alphabet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 These "technique" papers include one on getting an unbiased patient sample. 16 Another highlights two quasi-experimental methods-a stepped-wedge design, and wait-list crossover design-that seem particularly useful in PBRN practices. 17 This rich-and enriching-issue is our salute to our many PBRN colleagues advancing primary care research in family medicine.…”
Section: The Methods Of Pbrnmentioning
confidence: 99%