A Method for Linking Safety Factor to the Target Probability of Failure in Fire Safety Engineering

Abstract

Abstract. Ensuring occupants' safety in building fires is one of the most important aspects for fire safety engineering. Many uncertainties are inevitably introduced when estimating the occupant safety level, due to the high complexity of fire dynamics and the human behaviour in fires. Safety factor methods are traditionally employed to deal with such uncertainties. This kind of methods is easy to apply but leaves fire safety engineers unsure of the margin by which the design has failed. A method of linking safety factor and probability of failure in fire safety engineering is proposed in this study. An event tree is constructed to analyse potential fire scenarios that arise from the failure of fire protection systems. Considering uncertainties related to fire dynamics and evacuation, the traditional deterministic safety factor is considered as a random variable. Because there is no target probability of failure accepted by the whole fire safety engineering community, the concept of expected risk to life (ERL) is integrated to determine the target probability of failure. This method employs a Monte Carlo Simulation using Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) to calculate the required safety factor. A practical case study is conducted using the method proposed in this study.Keywords: probability of failure, safety factor, Monte Carlo simulation, fire safety engineering, uncertainty analysis. Reference to this paper should be made as follows: Kong, D.; Lu, S.; Frantzich, H.; Lo, S. M. 2013. A method for linking safety factor to the target probability of failure in fire safety engineering, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management 19(Supplement 1): S212-S221. http://dx

Input significance ranking of microalgae continuous culture models

“…31,32 For clear mathematical interpretability and straightforward computation, the Sobol index can directly evaluate the contribution of uncertain inputs to the variance of unconditional outputs. 45 On the other hand, the Morris method is appropriate for any kind of dependence in the input random vector and can be evaluated with a small sample size of the model, making it suitable for qualitative analysis. 39 However, the Morris method may be suboptimal in terms of interpretability and ease of calculation, while the Sobol method can be computationally expensive for a large number of inputs.…”

“…However, neither method alone provides a complete tool to describe the behavior of input factors 31,32 . For clear mathematical interpretability and straightforward computation, the Sobol index can directly evaluate the contribution of uncertain inputs to the variance of unconditional outputs 45 . On the other hand, the Morris method is appropriate for any kind of dependence in the input random vector and can be evaluated with a small sample size of the model, making it suitable for qualitative analysis 39 .…”

Evaluation of Pairwise Distances Among Points Forming a Regular Orthogonal Grid in a Hypercube

“…Kala et al 2017;Strauss et al 2017;Vahdatirad et al 2015), sensitivity analyses or reliability analyses (see e.g. Kong et al 2013;Liao et al 2015).…”

Development of an Integrated Risk Assessment Method to Quantify the Life Safety Risk in Buildings in Case of Fire

“…This is potentially a significant advancement in achieving a uniform safety level. However, still, no unbiased method has been developed that takes into account the effect of the uncertainty of the input parameters with respect to the obtained safety factor from ASET/RSET (available/required safe egress time) analyses [14]. Therefore, in the proposed quantitative risk assessment (QRA) method parameter uncertainties and the reliability of safety systems are consistently taken into account by means of probabilistic distributions that have direct impact on the obtained safety factor.…”