2010
DOI: 10.2981/09-044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for inferring extinction based on sighting records that change in frequency over time

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There have been a number of different approaches developed thus far within the group of methods for inferring extinction based on sighting records, such as those by Solow (1993a, b), Burgman et al (1995), Roberts & Solow (2003), McInerny et al (2006) and Jarić & Ebenhard (2010). However, as an example of their application on the estimation of invasive species distribution, we will use only the first and the most widely employed method, Solow's equation (Solow, 1993a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There have been a number of different approaches developed thus far within the group of methods for inferring extinction based on sighting records, such as those by Solow (1993a, b), Burgman et al (1995), Roberts & Solow (2003), McInerny et al (2006) and Jarić & Ebenhard (2010). However, as an example of their application on the estimation of invasive species distribution, we will use only the first and the most widely employed method, Solow's equation (Solow, 1993a).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This group of methods has so far been applied on the assessment of the extinction probability of a species, either a rare or endangered one (e.g. Roberts & Solow, 2003;McInerny et al, 2006;Jarić et al, 2009;Jarić & Ebenhard, 2010), or of an invasive species after an eradication program (Rout et al, 2009). However, there have been no attempts to use them for the assessment of species distributions; in other words, attempts to apply them for a spatial dimension, instead of a temporal one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, Bayesian methods give the probability that a species is extant, given the sighting data. There are several instances in which these two outputs have been confused in the existing literature (Burgman, Grimson & Ferson ; McCarthy ; McPherson & Myers ; Jaric & Ebenhard ; Chong et al . ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(), 2 Rivadeneira, Hunt & Roy (), 3 Solow (), 4 Collen, Purvis & Mace (), 5 Clements et al . () and 6 Jaric & Ebenhard ().…”
Section: Frequentist Methodsunclassified
“…Each method is characterized by a set of statistical assumptions conditioning its adequate application to a given time series (e.g., sampling probability uniformly distributed and independent, or dating error being constant; Table 1 and Solow et al, 2006), which if violated, can lead to the misclassification of a species as extinct or extant (so-called Type I and II statistical inference errors, respectively; Brosi and Biber, 2008;Jari c and Ebenhard, 2010;Fisher and Blomberg, 2012). In addition to methodological issues, the quality (number of records, record interval, variation in dating error over time) and the reliability of the datasets used to infer q (e.g., species misidentification e Rasmussen and Prys-Jones, 2003; an erroneous ceiling on apparent dates due the time limit of radiocarbon [ 14 C] dating validity e Walker, 2005) also strongly affect model performance (Rivadeneira et al, 2009;Solow et al, 2011;Bradshaw et al, 2012a;Lee et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%