1990
DOI: 10.1080/02827589009382611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for incorporating the within‐stand variation into forest management planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason behind this effect is the concave relationship between stand density and tree growth, and the non-linear relationship between tree size and growth. As a consequence of these relationships, the volume growth of a heterogeneous stand is smaller than that of a homogeneous stand (Pukkala 1990). When segments are used in planning they are assumed to be homogeneous and described with only one set of stand variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason behind this effect is the concave relationship between stand density and tree growth, and the non-linear relationship between tree size and growth. As a consequence of these relationships, the volume growth of a heterogeneous stand is smaller than that of a homogeneous stand (Pukkala 1990). When segments are used in planning they are assumed to be homogeneous and described with only one set of stand variables.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using ALS raster data in forest planning 1589 already long time ago. For example, Pukkala (1990) noted that growth predictions may be smaller when they are based on the individual relascope plots measured in visual compartment inventory, compared to a case where the field data are condensed into a single set of growing stock variables, which is the usual practice in visual compartment inventory. The thinning removal may be larger if thinning is simulated separately for individual field plots.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research and theoretical reasoning (Pukkala 1990;Pukkala and Kolström 1991) have shown that increasing within-stand variation in stand density and tree size decreases the volume increment of the stand, compared to homogeneous stands with the same average stand basal area and mean diameter. When the growing stock is described only with the average stand balsa area and mean diameter, it can be expected that growth predictors will be overestimated, the most in the most heterogeneous stands.…”
Section: Complicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This component of the approach thus combines random and systematic search components. Pukkala et al (1995), , , Pukkala and Kangas (1996), Kangas (1999) and PykaHiinen (2000) reported research and application results that show that this approach can effectively address multiobjective forest management problems while conveying the geographical location of management options. For example, it has been used in Finland to address interactive planning of private non-industrial forestry; public participation in forest management scheduling; risk and attitude toward risk in forest planning; and biodiversity, recreation and aesthetics considerations in forest management scheduling.…”
Section: Introduction To Heuristic Designmentioning
confidence: 96%