2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00253-012-4174-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for evaluating the host range of bacteriophages using phages fluorescently labeled with 5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine (EdU)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SYBR gold at 80°C for 10 min (38) demonstrated the highest fluorescence intensity and least background noise (data not shown); thus, these conditions were chosen as the standard for the rest of the study. As in a previous study (32), we found that the SYBR gold-labeled cyanophages produced a number of plaques on host lawn agarose plates equivalent to that obtained with unlabeled phage (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SYBR gold at 80°C for 10 min (38) demonstrated the highest fluorescence intensity and least background noise (data not shown); thus, these conditions were chosen as the standard for the rest of the study. As in a previous study (32), we found that the SYBR gold-labeled cyanophages produced a number of plaques on host lawn agarose plates equivalent to that obtained with unlabeled phage (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Third, fluorescently labeled viruses (FLVs) have been used as probes to tag their host cells for examination under the microscope (2931), a method that is limited only by the fact that it is low throughput. Additionally, while FLVs and flow cytometry have been combined to increase throughput (32), labeling of nonhost cells has plagued these experiments even when a thymidine analog (EdU [5-ethynyl-2′-deoxyuridine]) was used as an alternative virus-labeling agent (32). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating viral production using Viral BONCAT Accurate estimates of viral production in the ocean are critical for determining the influence of viral lysis on phytoplankton and bacterial mortality. A variety of methods have been employed to estimate viral production; these include, but are not limited to the incorporation of radiolabelled substrates into viral DNA (e.g., 3 H-thymidine or 32 P; Steward et al, 1992a,b;Fuhrman and Noble, 1995), TEMbased observations of visibly infected cells (e.g., Proctor et al, 1993;Steward et al, 1996), quantifying viral decay rates (e.g., Heldal and Bratbak, 1991;Bratbak et al, 1992), using fluorescently labelled viruses as tracers (e.g., Noble and Fuhrman, 2000;Ohno et al, 2012), and virus reduction approaches (e.g., Wilhelm et al, 2002;Helton et al, 2005;Winget et al, 2005;Weinbauer et al, 2010).…”
Section: Tracking Elemental Exchanges Between Viruses and Their Hostsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fluorescence based methods such as the general proteintargeted Viral-BONCAT are comparatively inexpensive and easy to employ with minimal sample manipulation and experimental set up. Nucleic-acid based fluorescence staining of viruses is widely used in microbial ecology studies to visualize and count populations (e.g., Sherr et al, 1987;Noble and Fuhrman, 1998;Hennes et al, 1995;Zhang et al, 2010;Ohno et al, 2012;Allers et al, 2013). By targeting proteins rather than nucleic acids, Viral-BONCAT potentially targets a broader range of viruses, such as single stranded RNA/DNA viruses, which are currently missed with SYBR staining methods, but may represent a large proportion of the viral assemblage in the surface ocean (Steward et al, 2013;Roux et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Tracking Elemental Exchanges Between Viruses and Their Hostsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is also difficult to apply to environmental samples where lysogenic infections are prevalent, because the method relies on observations of visible plaque formations, which are often absent from lysogenic infections [3, 58, 59]. Recently, Deng et al [52] demonstrated a new technique, known as "viral tagging," for identifying the interactions between cultivated host bacteria and their phages, which used the nucleic acid stain SYBR Gold to generate fluorescently labeled phages, so that the host cells fluoresced with viral tagging, thereby allowing the sorting of virus-tagged cells by flow cytometry [52, 60]. This emerging technique is undoubtedly helpful for not only exploring virus-host interactions in their natural habitats when the method is combined with other experimental tools, such as single viral genomics [61] and phageFISH [62], but also identifying viral receptors in macro-organisms (e.g., the mammalian gut) if the method is combined with a fluorescently labeled receptor protein during histological examinations.…”
Section: Virus-host Interactions and Emerging Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%