2016
DOI: 10.1111/jmi.12315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for estimating spatial resolution of real image in the Fourier domain

Abstract: Spatial resolution is a fundamental parameter in structural sciences. In crystallography, the resolution is determined from the detection limit of high-angle diffraction in reciprocal space. In electron microscopy, correlation in the Fourier domain is used for estimating the resolution. In this paper, we report a method for estimating the spatial resolution of real images from a logarithmic intensity plot in the Fourier domain. The logarithmic intensity plots of test images indicated that the full width at hal… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3 have their origin in erroneous high frequency restitution (see black triangle marker). Using Mizutani's single image resolution estimate [29] we can quantify that improvement further: we find that HUnet deconvolved images have 2-fold wider frequency support than the best focussed input image: 1.99 and 2.34 for fly and zebrafish, respectively. Despite the artefacts mentioned previously, ICTM deconvolution performs well but still underperforms compared to HUnet: 1.52 and 1.89 fold improvement in frequency support for fly and zebrafish, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Iterative Non-blind Deconvomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 have their origin in erroneous high frequency restitution (see black triangle marker). Using Mizutani's single image resolution estimate [29] we can quantify that improvement further: we find that HUnet deconvolved images have 2-fold wider frequency support than the best focussed input image: 1.99 and 2.34 for fly and zebrafish, respectively. Despite the artefacts mentioned previously, ICTM deconvolution performs well but still underperforms compared to HUnet: 1.52 and 1.89 fold improvement in frequency support for fly and zebrafish, respectively.…”
Section: Comparison With State-of-the-art Iterative Non-blind Deconvomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, X‐ray tomographic analyses, including the clinical CT, are performed by taking images from all directions. They hence visualize the sample with spatially isotropic resolution . Serial‐sectioning electron microscopy has been developed to visualize the 3‐D structure of biological samples, although the tissue sectioning distorts the tissue.…”
Section: Three‐dimensional Visualization Of Human Brain Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They hence visualize the sample with spatially isotropic resolution. [60][61][62][63][64] Serial-sectioning electron microscopy has been developed to visualize the 3-D structure of biological samples, 65 although the tissue sectioning distorts the tissue. Reconstruction of 3-D structures from the section images, therefore, requires a distortion-correction procedure, 65,66 which may obscure structural features relevant to the disease.…”
Section: Three-dimensional Visualization Of Human Brain Tissuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A paraffin section of a zebrafish brain stained with the reduced-silver impregnation (Mizutani et al, 2008) was taken with a light microscope (Eclipse80i, Nikon) equipped with a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (DXM1200F, Nikon), as reported previously (Mizutani et al, 2016), and subjected to 4 × 4 binning. The image dimensions were 500 × 500 pixels.…”
Section: Test Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we report a method for estimating the MTF from general sample images independently of the image type. It has been reported that the Gaussian PSF can be identified by plotting the logarithm of the squared norm of the Fourier transform of the image against the squared distance from the origin (Mizutani et al, 2016). A number of test images were generated and analyzed with this plot to extract their PSFs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%