Abstract:An original method for formulating surrogate fuels from actual syngas mixtures is presented and formalised. The method is the first example in the scientific literature of a rather complete tool for planning and setting up a laboratory syngas-fuelled engine test when some components of the syngas mixture are not available. Basically, the method allows a map to be built that provides the composition for a surrogate fuel once the composition of a syngas mixture is assigned, the components of a surrogate fuel are… Show more
“…As stated in Introduction, three-species surrogate mixtures made of hydrogen, methane, and nitrogen were used. Their compositions were specifically defined to simulate the three real syngas fuels of Table 2 according to the method suggested by Gobbato et al [21]. The method states that a surrogate mixture must allow the engine to achieve the same power output and fuel conversion efficiency as when the engine is fuelled with the real syngas.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Fuel Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The square brackets in Equation ( 4) indicate the volume concentration of the species they enclose, whereas the values of coefficients were calculated by a regression analysis of measured data (see [21] for details). Resulting values are: p = 1.2574; q = 0.4605; s = 0.6398; t = −0.2068; u = −0.0284.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Fuel Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the LHV s,mix and the S L of the real syngas are estimated, the composition of the corresponding three-component surrogate mixtures can be derived from the diagram of Figure 2. The diagram is an extended version of the one presented in [21], which relates the couple of values S L -LHV s,mix of a real syngas mixture to the two parameters α and β of its corresponding surrogate H 2 -CH 4 -N 2 mixture. The first parameter α is defined as the H2 to H2-CH4 volume ratio, whereas β is defined as the ratio between the non-reacting syngas fraction (simulated with a volume of N2) and the entire fresh charge (i.e., the air volume plus the volume of the non-combustible components).…”
Section: Calculation Of the Fuel Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the EQTF mixture also shows α = 0.6 and so it can be obtained using the same H 2 -CH 4 tank selected for the surrogate syngas mixtures. Finally, according to the method presented in [21], the equivalent fuel mixtures so obtained must be checked against the methane number (MN). The MN is defined as the percentage of methane in a methane-hydrogen mixture which has the same resistance to knock as the actual mixture.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Fuel Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, surrogate mixtures may avoid safety concerns during the testing activity related to the toxicity of carbon-monoxide present in real syngas fuels. Therefore, the experimental activity of the present study was carried out using surrogate mixtures, which do not contain CO and are made of H 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 , with a composition defined in accordance with the method suggested by the authors in a previous work [21].…”
The paper deals with the experimental study of a medium-load spark ignition engine under operation with different fuel mixtures among those deemed as promising for the transition towards carbon-free energy systems. In particular, the performance of a non-conventional ignition system, which permits the variation of the ignition energy, the spark intensity and duration, was studied fuelling the engine with 60–40% hydrogen–methane blends, three real syngas mixtures and one biogas. The paper is aimed to find the optimal ignition timing for minimum specific fuel consumption and the best setup of the ignition system for each of the fuel mixtures considered. To this end, a series of steady-state tests were performed at the dynamometer by varying the parameters of the ignition system and running the engine with surrogate hydrogen–methane–nitrogen mixtures that permit the simulation of hydrogen–methane blends, real syngas, and biogas. The results quantify the increase of spark advance associated with the decrease of the fuel quality and discuss the risk of knock onset during methane–hydrogen operation. It was demonstrated that the change of the ignition system parameters does not affect the value of optimum spark advance and, except for the ignition duration, all the parameters’ values are generally not very relevant at full load operation. In contrast, at partial load operation with low-quality syngas or high exhaust gas recirculation rate, it was found that an increase of the maximum ignition energy (to 300 mJ) allows for operation down to approximately 66% of the maximum load before combustion becomes incomplete. Further reductions, down to 25% of the maximum load, can be achieved by increasing the gap between the spark plug electrodes (from 0.25 to 0.5 mm).
“…As stated in Introduction, three-species surrogate mixtures made of hydrogen, methane, and nitrogen were used. Their compositions were specifically defined to simulate the three real syngas fuels of Table 2 according to the method suggested by Gobbato et al [21]. The method states that a surrogate mixture must allow the engine to achieve the same power output and fuel conversion efficiency as when the engine is fuelled with the real syngas.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Fuel Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The square brackets in Equation ( 4) indicate the volume concentration of the species they enclose, whereas the values of coefficients were calculated by a regression analysis of measured data (see [21] for details). Resulting values are: p = 1.2574; q = 0.4605; s = 0.6398; t = −0.2068; u = −0.0284.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Fuel Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the LHV s,mix and the S L of the real syngas are estimated, the composition of the corresponding three-component surrogate mixtures can be derived from the diagram of Figure 2. The diagram is an extended version of the one presented in [21], which relates the couple of values S L -LHV s,mix of a real syngas mixture to the two parameters α and β of its corresponding surrogate H 2 -CH 4 -N 2 mixture. The first parameter α is defined as the H2 to H2-CH4 volume ratio, whereas β is defined as the ratio between the non-reacting syngas fraction (simulated with a volume of N2) and the entire fresh charge (i.e., the air volume plus the volume of the non-combustible components).…”
Section: Calculation Of the Fuel Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the EQTF mixture also shows α = 0.6 and so it can be obtained using the same H 2 -CH 4 tank selected for the surrogate syngas mixtures. Finally, according to the method presented in [21], the equivalent fuel mixtures so obtained must be checked against the methane number (MN). The MN is defined as the percentage of methane in a methane-hydrogen mixture which has the same resistance to knock as the actual mixture.…”
Section: Calculation Of the Fuel Mixturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, surrogate mixtures may avoid safety concerns during the testing activity related to the toxicity of carbon-monoxide present in real syngas fuels. Therefore, the experimental activity of the present study was carried out using surrogate mixtures, which do not contain CO and are made of H 2 , CH 4 , and N 2 , with a composition defined in accordance with the method suggested by the authors in a previous work [21].…”
The paper deals with the experimental study of a medium-load spark ignition engine under operation with different fuel mixtures among those deemed as promising for the transition towards carbon-free energy systems. In particular, the performance of a non-conventional ignition system, which permits the variation of the ignition energy, the spark intensity and duration, was studied fuelling the engine with 60–40% hydrogen–methane blends, three real syngas mixtures and one biogas. The paper is aimed to find the optimal ignition timing for minimum specific fuel consumption and the best setup of the ignition system for each of the fuel mixtures considered. To this end, a series of steady-state tests were performed at the dynamometer by varying the parameters of the ignition system and running the engine with surrogate hydrogen–methane–nitrogen mixtures that permit the simulation of hydrogen–methane blends, real syngas, and biogas. The results quantify the increase of spark advance associated with the decrease of the fuel quality and discuss the risk of knock onset during methane–hydrogen operation. It was demonstrated that the change of the ignition system parameters does not affect the value of optimum spark advance and, except for the ignition duration, all the parameters’ values are generally not very relevant at full load operation. In contrast, at partial load operation with low-quality syngas or high exhaust gas recirculation rate, it was found that an increase of the maximum ignition energy (to 300 mJ) allows for operation down to approximately 66% of the maximum load before combustion becomes incomplete. Further reductions, down to 25% of the maximum load, can be achieved by increasing the gap between the spark plug electrodes (from 0.25 to 0.5 mm).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.