2016
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for converting dose-to-medium to dose-to-tissue in Monte Carlo studies of gold nanoparticle-enhanced radiotherapy

Abstract: Gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have shown potential in recent years as a means of therapeutic dose enhancement in radiation therapy. However, a major challenge in moving towards clinical implementation is the exact characterisation of the dose enhancement they provide. Monte Carlo studies attempt to explore this property, but they often face computational limitations when examining macroscopic scenarios. In this study, a method of converting dose from macroscopic simulations, where the medium is defined as a mixtur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table presents dose ratios (dose‐to‐tissue relative to dose to a homogeneous tissue‐gold mixture) for various gold concentrations and source energies. While many values computed in the current work agree with the published values of Koger and Kirkby within the 1 σ statistical uncertainties indicated, all values agree within 2 σ uncertainties except for the 20 keV beam with 20 nm diameter GNPs at a concentration of 20 mg/g, which is at 2.1 σ . The largest percent difference observed is 2.6% for the 50 keV beam with 20 nm diameter GNPs having a concentration of 20 mg/g (quadrature sum of the 1 σ statistical uncertainties is 1.3%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Table presents dose ratios (dose‐to‐tissue relative to dose to a homogeneous tissue‐gold mixture) for various gold concentrations and source energies. While many values computed in the current work agree with the published values of Koger and Kirkby within the 1 σ statistical uncertainties indicated, all values agree within 2 σ uncertainties except for the 20 keV beam with 20 nm diameter GNPs at a concentration of 20 mg/g, which is at 2.1 σ . The largest percent difference observed is 2.6% for the 50 keV beam with 20 nm diameter GNPs having a concentration of 20 mg/g (quadrature sum of the 1 σ statistical uncertainties is 1.3%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photons and electrons were simulated down to 100 eV, and electrons leaving the microcavity were transported back into it for full energy deposition. Ratios of the dose‐to‐tissue relative to dose to the homogeneous blend of tissue and gold were published (to allow conversion of dose scored in a mixture to dose‐to‐tissue) for a range of source energies and GNP concentrations …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations