2010
DOI: 10.1002/aic.12236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for computing the partial derivatives of experimental data

Abstract: This article describes a procedure for obtaining the partial derivatives of experimental data that depend on two independent variables. The starting equation is an ill‐posed integral equation of the first kind. Tikhonov regularization is used to keep noise amplification under control. Implementation of the computation steps is described and the performance of the procedure is demonstrated by four practical examples. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the imposition of the additional condition of negative second derivatives (if required), it has been successful in converting experimentally measured oxide layer thickness data into monotonic decreasing instantaneous rate of oxide growth. This success is attributed to the adjustable regularization parameter that maintains a fine balance between noise amplification inherent of numerical differentiation and the retention of as much of the physical information in the time‐thickness data as possible . This is a major improvement over unregularized numerical differentiation procedure such as the various finite difference schemes or differentiation based on spline curves such the popular Savitzky–Golay method …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the imposition of the additional condition of negative second derivatives (if required), it has been successful in converting experimentally measured oxide layer thickness data into monotonic decreasing instantaneous rate of oxide growth. This success is attributed to the adjustable regularization parameter that maintains a fine balance between noise amplification inherent of numerical differentiation and the retention of as much of the physical information in the time‐thickness data as possible . This is a major improvement over unregularized numerical differentiation procedure such as the various finite difference schemes or differentiation based on spline curves such the popular Savitzky–Golay method …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it should be noted that, while this estimation scheme was applied here in the context of modifier adaptation, the theory is by no means limited to this context and could perhaps find use in other fields where gradient estimation is important [13], [14], [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More advanced methods of estimating the gradient from discrete measurements are certainly possible (Yeow et al, 2010;Bunin et al, 2013a), but would require greater computational effort, whereas a least-squares regression is easily carried out within the 60-ms time constraint.…”
Section: Choice and Configuration Of Rto Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%