2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for calculating the liquid density for the CO2–H2O–NaCl system under CO2 storage condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most recently, McBride-Wright et al [25; 26] reported measurements of the density of under-saturated aqueous CO2 + H2O mixtures using a vibrating-tube apparatus at pressures up to 100 MPa, over the temperature range (274 to 449) K, together with an empirical correlation for the partial molar volume of CO2 that was able to represent his density data to within ±0.04 %. Partial-molar volumes predicted using the correlations of Li et al [24] and McBride-Wright et al [25; 26] differed by up to 7 %, whereas partial molar volumes calculated using the correlation of Sedlbauer et al [22] had a maximum relative deviation of only 2.5 % from the model of McBride-Wright et al [25; 26].…”
Section: Existing Models For Predicting Saturated Phase Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most recently, McBride-Wright et al [25; 26] reported measurements of the density of under-saturated aqueous CO2 + H2O mixtures using a vibrating-tube apparatus at pressures up to 100 MPa, over the temperature range (274 to 449) K, together with an empirical correlation for the partial molar volume of CO2 that was able to represent his density data to within ±0.04 %. Partial-molar volumes predicted using the correlations of Li et al [24] and McBride-Wright et al [25; 26] differed by up to 7 %, whereas partial molar volumes calculated using the correlation of Sedlbauer et al [22] had a maximum relative deviation of only 2.5 % from the model of McBride-Wright et al [25; 26].…”
Section: Existing Models For Predicting Saturated Phase Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In the case of nonelectrolyte solutes, such as CO2, the model was tested over the temperature range (303 to 725) K at pressures to 35 MPa. Subsequently Duan et al [23] and then Li et al [24] presented alternative empirical correlations for the partial molar volume of CO2 in both H2O + CO2 and NaCl(aq) + CO2 mixtures at temperatures between (273 and 573) K and pressures to 100 MPa. Most recently, McBride-Wright et al [25; 26] reported measurements of the density of under-saturated aqueous CO2 + H2O mixtures using a vibrating-tube apparatus at pressures up to 100 MPa, over the temperature range (274 to 449) K, together with an empirical correlation for the partial molar volume of CO2 that was able to represent his density data to within ±0.04 %.…”
Section: Existing Models For Predicting Saturated Phase Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model by Li et al [54] combines the density model by Mao and Duan [55] for aqueous NaCl solutions with a similar approach to that of Duan et al [56] for the density of CO 2 -H 2 O-NaCl solutions. Our modifications consisted of adopting the thermodynamic formulation IAPWS97 [57] for pure water density and calculating the volumetric Debye-Hückel limiting law slope by the linearization of an extensive dataset [58] of tabulated values.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A slightly modified version of the aqueous phase density model by Li et al [54], which accounts for dissolved CO 2, was incorporated into the analysis tool. The model by Li et al [54] combines the density model by Mao and Duan [55] for aqueous NaCl solutions with a similar approach to that of Duan et al [56] for the density of CO 2 -H 2 O-NaCl solutions.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most data is not applicable to CO 2 sequestration because it does not correspond to the saturated state of dissolved CO 2 . We therefore use data reported by Li et al (2011), Song et al (2005, Bando et al (2004), and Teng et al (1997), for the density of saturated solutions. This data is plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%