1983
DOI: 10.1080/00207548308942409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for assembly line balancing with more than one worker in each station

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This impact is illustrated in Fig. 4 for instances of the problem F easible (3). One can see that the higher values of Idle imply the smaller solution time of the problem F easible (3).…”
Section: Exact Solution By Milp Solvermentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This impact is illustrated in Fig. 4 for instances of the problem F easible (3). One can see that the higher values of Idle imply the smaller solution time of the problem F easible (3).…”
Section: Exact Solution By Milp Solvermentioning
confidence: 90%
“…According to Baybars (1986), the simultaneous assembly line balancing and choice of processing alternatives is known as assembly line design problem (ALDP). For further research see Pinto et al (1983), Akagi et al (1983), Graves and Lamar (1983), Wilhelm (1997, 1998), Wilhelm (1999), Bukchin and Tzur (2000), Nicosia et al (2002). A mathematical program for such an ALDP is presented below:…”
Section: Wage Synergiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the works of Akagi et al (1983), Wilson (1986) and Lutz and Davis (1994), it is assumed that the performance of the workers performing the same task is the same, and that the task processing time depends solely on the number of workers assigned to this task. Thus, they made the same assumption as we do for problem P.…”
Section: Overall Statement Of the Problem And Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%