2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2014.10.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for aircraft magnetic interference compensation based on small signal model and LMS algorithm

Abstract: Aeromagnetic interference could not be compensated effectively if the precision of parameters which are solved by the aircraft magnetic field model is low. In order to improve the compensation effect under this condition, a method based on small signal model and least mean square (LMS) algorithm is proposed. According to the method, the initial values of adaptive filter's weight vector are calculated with the solved model parameters through small signal model at first, then the small amount of direction cosine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general aircraft aeromagnetic interference compensation model proposed by Tolles and Lawson has been gradually developed to the classical Tolles‐Lawson equation (Bickel, 1979a, 1979b; Leach, 1980; Tolles & Lawson, 1950). In order to solve it, Leliak (1961) proposed a method to calculate the aeromagnetic interference compensation coefficients based on the aircraft's pitch, roll, and yaw maneuvering flight actions, and it has been in use since then (Du et al., 2019; Feng et al., 2022; Fitzgerald & Perrin, 2015; Hardwick, 1996; Hezel, 2020; Qiao et al., 2021; Rice and Joseph, 1993; Zhou et al., 2014).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general aircraft aeromagnetic interference compensation model proposed by Tolles and Lawson has been gradually developed to the classical Tolles‐Lawson equation (Bickel, 1979a, 1979b; Leach, 1980; Tolles & Lawson, 1950). In order to solve it, Leliak (1961) proposed a method to calculate the aeromagnetic interference compensation coefficients based on the aircraft's pitch, roll, and yaw maneuvering flight actions, and it has been in use since then (Du et al., 2019; Feng et al., 2022; Fitzgerald & Perrin, 2015; Hardwick, 1996; Hezel, 2020; Qiao et al., 2021; Rice and Joseph, 1993; Zhou et al., 2014).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of minimizing interference for traditional aeromagnetic surveys has been addressed thoroughly by developing compensation strategies both in hardware and in software [115][116][117][118][119]. A calibration flight is required to establish the relationship between aircraft maneuver and the corresponding changes of magnetic field base on the T-L model [120]. Generally, these calibration flights are executed in box patterns and at high altitudes (above 100 m AGL) where the change of magnetic field gradient can be ignored, a total of 3 pitch (±5 • ), 3 roll (±10 • ), and 3 yaw (±5 • ) maneuvers are sequentially executed in four orthogonal directions.…”
Section: Suppression Of Uav Magnetic Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%