2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2014.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A method for aggregation of trapezoidal fuzzy estimates under group decision-making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is obvious that P m j¼1 ω j ¼ 1. In [7] it is proved that the function in expression (15) is always continuous (the denominator does not turn into 0 in any case).…”
Section: Credit Risk Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is obvious that P m j¼1 ω j ¼ 1. In [7] it is proved that the function in expression (15) is always continuous (the denominator does not turn into 0 in any case).…”
Section: Credit Risk Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proposition 1 [7]. For any finite collection of trapezoidal fuzzy numbersR j ÈÉ , j ¼ 1, m, m ¼ 2, 3, … , the following holds:…”
Section: Credit Risk Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Then, the questionnaires containing incomplete and irrelevant answers have been removed and twenty-five questionnaires have been finalized for each site [67]. The opinions of users have been quantified and aggregated for every question by employing fuzzy aggregation technique as portrayed by Tsabadze [68]. Perceived design quality index value (DQIU) has been obtained by computing the weighted average of twenty questions.…”
Section: Validation Of the Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%