A method for achieving high response rates in national surveys of U.S. primary care physicians

Abstract

Physician questionnaires are commonly used in health services research; however, many survey studies are limited by low response rate. We describe the effectiveness of a method to maximize survey response without using incentives, the effectiveness of survey reminders over time, and differences in response rates based on survey mode and primary care specialty. As part of a study to assess vaccine policy issues, 13 separate surveys were conducted by internet and mail over the period of 2008 to 2013. Surveys were conducted among pre-recruited networks of pediatricians, family physicians and general internists. Each network was active for 2 years and responded to 3–6 surveys. Physicians who indicated preference to respond through an online survey received up to 9 e-mailed requests to complete the questionnaire and up to 2 mailed questionnaires. Physicians who chose to respond by mail received up to 3 mailed questionnaires and a reminder postcard. For 6 of the 13 surveys conducted over the 6 year period, an additional mailing using a hand-addressed envelope was mailed to non-responders at the end of the usual protocol. Effectiveness of survey methods was measured by response rates. The overall response rates varied from 66‒83%. Response rates declined 17 percentage-points on average between the first and last surveys administered within each physician network. The internet group consistently had higher response rates than the mail group (74% vs. 62% on average). An additional mailing in a hand-written envelope boosted the final response rate by 11 percentage-points. Self-selection of survey mode, multiple reminders, and hand-written envelopes are effective methods for maximizing response rates in physician surveys.

Does this lung nodule need urgent review? A discrete choice experiment of Australian general practitioners

“…The low response rate (3.7%) may have led to selection bias, although participating GPs were representative of all the Australian States and Territories, except the Northern Territory. Response rates to physician surveys are often poor and have been reported to be declining, due to a number of factors, including lack of time, ineligibility and inaccuracy in registration details [28,29]. Interestingly, more than one third of practices had a policy not to respond to survey requests in one Canadian study [28].…”

Factors Influencing Cancer Genetic Somatic Mutation Test Ordering By Cancer Physicians

“…The response rate (RR) in this study was consistent with United States physician surveys where questionnaires without incentives have a response rate of < 30% as compared to ≥ 50% when incentives are included. 11 Whilst cash incentives have been shown to increase the RR among North American clinicians, 12 and Australian pharmacists, 13 to our knowledge, this is the rst study to report similar ndings in Australian cancer specialists.…”

Contraception in women with obesity with special reference to gastric bypass surgery

“…When response rates are high, the potential for differences between respondents and non-respondents is lower, increasing the likelihood that survey results can be generalised to the population, and reducing the likelihood of response bias (124). The electronic questionnaire has become more common, and has shown higher response rates (125), but this was not an option for our study since we did not have access to electronic mail addresses to our population. We included a stamped return envelope and sent two reminders to non-responders in order to optimise response rates.…”