A method and tool for assessing object-oriented projects and metrics management

Abstract

The number of metrics and tools for the assessment/control of object-oriented project is increasing. In the last years, the eort spent in de®ning new metrics has not been followed by a comparable eort in establishing methods and procedures for their systematic application. To make the investment on project assessment eective, speci®c methods and tools for product and process control have to be applied and customized on the basis of speci®c needs. In this paper, the experience of the authors cumulated in interpreting assessment results and de®ning a tool and a method for the assessment of object-oriented systems is reported. The tool architecture and method for system assessment provide support for: (1) customizing the assessment process to satisfy company needs, project typology, product pro®le, etc.; (2) visualizing results in an understandable way; (3) suggesting actions for tackling with problems; (4) avoiding unuseful interventions and shortening the assessment analysis; (5) supporting metrics validation and tuning. The tool and method have been de®ned in years of work in identifying tool features and general guidelines to de®ne a modus operandi with metrics, with a special care to detect analysis and design problems as soon as possible, and for eort estimation and prediction. In this line, a speci®c assessment tool has been built and used as a research prototype in several projects. Ó

Bike Sharing Prediction using Deep Neural Networks

“…We played out the item metric examination on the given instructive gathering. From the data examination [13], [14], [17], [22], [23], [25] we can pick which property can be viewed as and which quality can be disregarded. For instance, in the Pearson procedure if the estimation of r is more than 0.5 then the attributes are thought to be immovably related and if it is underneath 0.3 the characteristics are insufficiently related.…”

Prediction of Breast Cancer by the Light weight Systems

“…)-(y i )) 2 values  Supplant the total values in the accompanying structure to get the enhanced cost of 0 J(θ1) =1/2m∑(hθ (x i )-(y i )) 2 Table.3. Linear Regression A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 A9 A1 1 1.9, 1 2.0, 1 1.2, 0.5 1.4, 0.5 -1.3, 1 1.3, 1 -A2 1.9, 1 1 0.1, 1 -1.8, 0.5 -2, 1 0.6, 1 -A3 2.0, 1 0.1, 1 1 -1.8, 0.5 -2, 1 0.6, 1 -A4 1.2, 0.5 --1 0.7, 1 -1.2, 1 --A5 1.4, 0.5 1.8, 0.5 1.8, 0.5 0.7, 1 1 2.9, 0.5 1.3, 1 - (Fioravanti, 2000), we will get the enhanced θ value, and for this θ trait value can be proficiently relapsed after the Pearson likeness measure (where r>0.8). This technique is utilized for cost improving which implies advancing the variable.…”

Empirical assessment of the impact of structural properties on the changeability of object-oriented software

“…Thus, one important future application of this research is related to research that have studied software quality decay and proposed ways to measure such decay, e.g. [3,4,26,31,[33][34][35]41,43,45].…”