2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-02508-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Metalanguage for Guarded Iteration

Abstract: Notions of guardedness serve to delineate admissible recursive definitions in various settings in a compositional manner. In recent work, we have introduced an axiomatic notion of guardedness in symmetric monoidal categories, which serves as a unifying framework for various examples from program semantics, process algebra, and beyond. In the present paper, we propose a generic metalanguage for guarded iteration based on combining this notion with the fine-grain callby-value paradigm, which we intend as a unify… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Next we build a syntax-independent, denotational counterpart to the operational semantics previously introduced. In order to achieve this, we will take advantage of the general principles of fine-grain call-by-value [15,18,27], and thus introduce a monad for the duration semantics. Recall that (−) ⋆ denotes the Kleisli lifting of a monad T, the set R + denotes the non-negative real numbers and the set R+ denotes the non-negative real numbers with infinity.…”
Section: Denotational Duration Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next we build a syntax-independent, denotational counterpart to the operational semantics previously introduced. In order to achieve this, we will take advantage of the general principles of fine-grain call-by-value [15,18,27], and thus introduce a monad for the duration semantics. Recall that (−) ⋆ denotes the Kleisli lifting of a monad T, the set R + denotes the non-negative real numbers and the set R+ denotes the non-negative real numbers with infinity.…”
Section: Denotational Duration Semanticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The submonad H + of H that arises from this restriction, was studied in [16] and enjoys better properties than H; we expect our adequacy result to restrict accordingly. This task is however not entirely trivial, as it requires a considerable adaptation of the language to keep track of progressiveness of terms, yet a systematic approach to this issue was proposed recently [18].…”
Section: Conclusion and Further Workmentioning
confidence: 99%