“…In addition, MOFs possess one or several innate characteristics, including large surface area, large porosity, controllable pore size, designable structure, and good compatibility with polymers. − In view of this, MOF materials have been suggested as alternative nanofillers for improving membrane separation performance. A series of MOFs, including UiO-66-PSBMA, CuBTC, ZIF-8, ZIF-67, MIL-100(Fe), MIL-101(Cr), UiO-66-NH2, Cu-iMOFs, and NH2-MIL-101, were tested in ultrafiltration membranes for antifouling and exhibited enhancement of gas, pharmaceutical waste, natural organic matter, and oily wastewater separation. − Furthermore, MIL-101(Cr)-, ZIF-8 (mZIF)-, HKUST-1-, CuBTC-, and ZIF-93-based nanofiltration membranes were applied for the removal of endocrine-disrupting compounds, organic solvents, and divalent salts. − In continuation of research on recent progress, researchers have reported innovative casting solution strategies for the fabrication of TFN membranes with incorporation of different MOFs into selective PA layers; positive results have been achieved. The fabricated TFN membranes developed additional surface properties and demonstrated a significant increase in rejection and water permeability. ,− However, it has been noted that some MOF nanoparticles demonstrated poor stability in water and difficulty of dispersing in the aqueous phase.…”