2018
DOI: 10.3791/58392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Metadata Extraction Approach for Clinical Case Reports to Enable Advanced Understanding of Biomedical Concepts

Abstract: Clinical case reports (CCRs) are a valuable means of sharing observations and insights in medicine. The form of these documents varies, and their content includes descriptions of numerous, novel disease presentations and treatments. Thus far, the text data within CCRs is largely unstructured, requiring significant human and computational effort to render these data useful for in-depth analysis. In this protocol, we describe methods for identifying metadata corresponding to specific biomedical concepts frequent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, BDA tools would allow for a qualitative/quantitative evaluation of SMCRs based on the quality of information, quality of images, the presence of citations from the literature, the degree of involvement in the discussion and other parameters. Some authors have already proposed a particular type of automated annotation analysis for clinical CRs, defined as ‘metadata extraction approach’; it consists in extracting text and numerical values from a large collection of published CRs to standardise the description of the discussed specific biomedical concepts 15 16. The BDA tools and metadata extraction approach would allow the development of SMCR databases which may be published in special online sections of Pathology journals or dedicated websites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, BDA tools would allow for a qualitative/quantitative evaluation of SMCRs based on the quality of information, quality of images, the presence of citations from the literature, the degree of involvement in the discussion and other parameters. Some authors have already proposed a particular type of automated annotation analysis for clinical CRs, defined as ‘metadata extraction approach’; it consists in extracting text and numerical values from a large collection of published CRs to standardise the description of the discussed specific biomedical concepts 15 16. The BDA tools and metadata extraction approach would allow the development of SMCR databases which may be published in special online sections of Pathology journals or dedicated websites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manual annotation of clinical case reports has been pursued in previous studies that have extracted potential adverse drug event relations (4) and biomedical concepts (5). Corpora consisting of clinical case reports have been employed for training machine reading comprehension (6) and automated recognition of rare disease phenotypes (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers can extract data from the whole case report or from the abstract section of the article. In an effort to provide more insight and help educate others on extracting metadata from case reports,Caufield et al (2018) published a video article on the topic in the Journal of Visualized Experiments. In their video and corresponding article, the team provides the steps needed to successfully apply text mining to large sets of unstructured data to extract data in order to provide standardized ways to annotate biomedical concepts Luo et al (2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%