2018
DOI: 10.1186/s40965-018-0057-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A metadata ADE for CityGML

Abstract: While there exist international standards for geospatial metadata (ISO 19115), these are rarely used in practice for 3D datasets, and one of the OGC standards for 3D city models, CityGML, does not offer a mechanism to store metadata in a structured way. Having metadata in CityGML files, which are in practice often very large and complex, would provide us with the ability to quickly understand the nature of a dataset and to determine if it is relevant for a specific task. A lack of metadata introduces uncertain… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

7
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CityGML has very limited support for metadata [Labetski et al, 2018]. Only a few elements are supported, such as the bounding box and the CRS, and most elements are on the city model level and not on the module or city feature level.…”
Section: Support For Metadatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CityGML has very limited support for metadata [Labetski et al, 2018]. Only a few elements are supported, such as the bounding box and the CRS, and most elements are on the city model level and not on the module or city feature level.…”
Section: Support For Metadatamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These attributes are ISO 19115 compliant and based on the CityGML Metadata ADE developed by Reference [37].…”
Section: Citymodelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the second paper focused on the same domain of 3D GIS, Labetski et al [21] propose a metadata ADE for CityGML. While the concept of metadata does not sound thrilling to most, it is a crucial sidekick to discover and access any type of data, including 3D city models.…”
Section: Open Geospatial Standardsmentioning
confidence: 99%