2011
DOI: 10.1002/for.1264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta‐learning Framework for Bankruptcy Prediction

Abstract: The implication of corporate bankruptcy prediction is important to financial institutions when making lending decisions. In related studies, many bankruptcy prediction models have been developed based on some machine-learning techniques. This paper presents a meta-learning framework, which is composed of two-level classifiers for bankruptcy prediction. The first-level multiple classifiers perform the data reduction task by filtering out unrepresentative training data. Then, the outputs of the first-level class… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This subject dealt with studies which analyze the classification effectiveness of such ensemble classifiers by relying on several models of base classifiers developed by Hua et al (2007), Zhang et al (2010) and Twala (2010). The use of ensemble classifiers with combining (stacking) the results of several classifiers in a single meta-classifier was discussed in studies such as those by Iturriaga and Sanz (2015), Tsai and Wu (2008) and Tsai and Hsu (2013). Furthermore, many studies are dedicated to the use of various techniques of combining the results of base model classification: such as neural networks in the form of self-organizing maps (SOMs), rough sets techniques, case-based reasoning and classifier consensus methods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This subject dealt with studies which analyze the classification effectiveness of such ensemble classifiers by relying on several models of base classifiers developed by Hua et al (2007), Zhang et al (2010) and Twala (2010). The use of ensemble classifiers with combining (stacking) the results of several classifiers in a single meta-classifier was discussed in studies such as those by Iturriaga and Sanz (2015), Tsai and Wu (2008) and Tsai and Hsu (2013). Furthermore, many studies are dedicated to the use of various techniques of combining the results of base model classification: such as neural networks in the form of self-organizing maps (SOMs), rough sets techniques, case-based reasoning and classifier consensus methods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process is also able to determine the weights of the ensemble models in the fusion schema, based on their local performance around the query. Some other recent approaches to development of metalearning frameworks can be found in Matijaš et al (2013) for the problem of electricity load forecasting, Abbasi et al (2012) for financial fraud detection or Tsai and Hsu (2013) for bankruptcy prediction.…”
Section: Notions Of Metalearningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practical terms, none of the predictive variables or functions is completely independent. In recent years, artificial intelligence models such as artificial neural networks, association rules mining, genetic programming models, case‐based reasoning, and support vector machines (SVMs) have been regarded as alternate classification technologies that can be used instead of statistical modelling to develop business failure prediction models (Kumar & Ravi, ; Ravisankar & Ravi, ; Tsai & Hsu, ; Geng et al , ). In particular, artificial intelligence techniques have been shown to have superior performance compared with statistical techniques (Tsai, ; Sun et al , ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%