2015
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta‐analytic review of religious or spiritual involvement and social health among cancer patients

Abstract: Background Religion and spirituality (R/S) play an important role in the daily lives of many cancer patients. There has been great interest in determining whether R/S factors are related to clinically-relevant health outcomes. This meta-analytic review examined associations between dimensions of R/S and social health (e.g., social roles and relationships). Methods A systematic search of PubMed, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases was conducted, and data were extracted by four pairs of investigat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
68
1
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(37 reference statements)
3
68
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent meta-analyses of 1341 effects drawn from over 44,000 patients with cancer demonstrated an overall positive relationship between RS and self-reported measures of health outcomes (Park et al, 2015) but the strength of that relationship varied as a function of both the RS dimension and the physical (Jim et al, 2015), mental (Salsman et al, 2015), and social (Sherman et al, 2015) outcomes assessed. The strongest relationships were found between affective dimensions of RS (e.g., sense of meaning, purpose, or connection to a source larger than oneself) and mental health outcomes, whereas behavioral RS constructs (e.g., service attendance, prayer and meditation) showed few significant associations with health, except for a modest positive relationship with social health outcomes.…”
Section: Rs and Health Research: Current Findings And Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent meta-analyses of 1341 effects drawn from over 44,000 patients with cancer demonstrated an overall positive relationship between RS and self-reported measures of health outcomes (Park et al, 2015) but the strength of that relationship varied as a function of both the RS dimension and the physical (Jim et al, 2015), mental (Salsman et al, 2015), and social (Sherman et al, 2015) outcomes assessed. The strongest relationships were found between affective dimensions of RS (e.g., sense of meaning, purpose, or connection to a source larger than oneself) and mental health outcomes, whereas behavioral RS constructs (e.g., service attendance, prayer and meditation) showed few significant associations with health, except for a modest positive relationship with social health outcomes.…”
Section: Rs and Health Research: Current Findings And Critiquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research, exemplified by recent spirituality and cancer meta-analysis Sherman et al 2015;Salsman et al 2015) confirms the importance of attending to this domain, is such that the Scottish National Health Service (NHS Education Scotland 2009), the US Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organisations (Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Associations 2005), and New Zealand's Ministry of Health (Ministry of Health 2010) all call for spiritual needs to be addressed in various healthcare settings. Inevitably, there are challenges to this literature (Sloan et al 1999), which affirms the need for more rigorous research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one in a series of three meta-analyses, designed to summarize and synthesize the associations between R/S and patient-reported physical, 14 mental, and social health outcomes. 15 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%