A Meta-Analysis on Behavioral Support Training and General Education Teacher Implementation
Mark D. Samudre,
Lauren M. LeJeune,
Eric J. Anderson
et al.
Abstract:The success of teachers is tied to their effectiveness in managing student behavior. In this meta-analysis, we identified 49 single-case-design studies that evaluated the effectiveness of teacher training on their implementation of behavioral support strategies. Training was most often provided in a one-on-one format ( n = 18) and included ongoing coaching ( n = 20). Thirty-three of the 49 designs met What Works Clearinghouse standards with or without reservations. The overall between-case standardized mean di… Show more
“…Given the relative recency of development and use of meaningful and viable single-case effect sizes, single-case researchers do not have as much information about the magnitude of behavior change likely in a given context. However, recent work has been done to establish both intervention-specific effect-size estimates (e.g., via meta-analyses; McClain et al, 2021; Samudre et al, 2023) and broader benchmarks that are not intervention-specific (J. C. Chow, 2023; Pustejovsky et al, 2023).…”
Visual analysis is historically and conventionally used to draw conclusions about outcomes in single-case studies, but researchers are increasingly using effect sizes to supplement conclusions drawn about functional relations with additional information about magnitude of behavior change. However, there is limited information about the extent to which methodological choices (i.e., design type, measurement system) may impact the magnitude of behavior change. We conducted a systematic review of interventions conducted in elementary school classrooms to characterize effect sizes for engagement behaviors and challenging behaviors in those studies. We found that researchers most often used A-B-A-B and multiple baseline across-participants designs, that a variety of measurement systems were used for engagement but not challenging behavior, and that some variability in effect-size distributions can be explained by dependent variable type, design type, and measurement system. The empirically derived distributions from this study may be helpful for single-case researchers to contextualize past, ongoing, and future work related to engagement and challenging behavior.
“…Given the relative recency of development and use of meaningful and viable single-case effect sizes, single-case researchers do not have as much information about the magnitude of behavior change likely in a given context. However, recent work has been done to establish both intervention-specific effect-size estimates (e.g., via meta-analyses; McClain et al, 2021; Samudre et al, 2023) and broader benchmarks that are not intervention-specific (J. C. Chow, 2023; Pustejovsky et al, 2023).…”
Visual analysis is historically and conventionally used to draw conclusions about outcomes in single-case studies, but researchers are increasingly using effect sizes to supplement conclusions drawn about functional relations with additional information about magnitude of behavior change. However, there is limited information about the extent to which methodological choices (i.e., design type, measurement system) may impact the magnitude of behavior change. We conducted a systematic review of interventions conducted in elementary school classrooms to characterize effect sizes for engagement behaviors and challenging behaviors in those studies. We found that researchers most often used A-B-A-B and multiple baseline across-participants designs, that a variety of measurement systems were used for engagement but not challenging behavior, and that some variability in effect-size distributions can be explained by dependent variable type, design type, and measurement system. The empirically derived distributions from this study may be helpful for single-case researchers to contextualize past, ongoing, and future work related to engagement and challenging behavior.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.