A Meta-Analysis of the Willingness to Pay for Reductions in Pesticide Risk Exposure

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in SummaryThe use of environmental policy instruments such as eco-labelling and pesticide taxes should preferably be based on disaggregate estimates of the individuals' willingness to pay (WTP) for pesticide risk reductions. We review the empirical valuation literature dealing with pesticide risk exposure and develop a taxonomy of environmental and human health risks associated with pesticide usage. Subsequently, we use meta-analysis to investigate the variation in WTP estimates for reduced pesticide risk exposure. Our findings show that the WTP for reduced risk exposure is approximately 15% greater for medium, and 80% greater for high risk-levels, as compared to low risk levels. The income elasticity of pesticide risk exposure is generally positive, although not overly robust. Most results indicate that the demand for human health and environmental safety is highly elastic. We also show that geographical differences, characteristics of the survey, and the type safety device (eco-labelling, integrated management, or bans) are important drivers of the valuation results. Keywords

A meta-regression analysis of forest carbon offset costs

“…The nonexperimental setting of meta-analysis introduces specific methodological challenges because the meta-analysis is intrinsically heteroskedastic: the effect-sizes originate from studies with differing numbers of observations, which results in different estimated standard errors (Travisi et al 2004). The true data-generating process is often unknown, which leads to a mix of correct and erroneous effect-size measures, and the varying sets of control variables across the studies induce omitted variable bias and (or) multicollinearity in at least a subset of the available primary studies (Koetse et al 2005).…”

A Meta-Analysis Framework and Its Application for Exploring the Driving Causes to Social Vulnerability

“…Meta-analysis has now become a widely accepted research tool, encompassing a range of procedures used in a variety of disciplines, such as medicine, nursing, psychology, labor economics, environmental science, and transportation science (Gaarder 2002;Yu 2002;Greenaway, Milne et al 2004;Travisi, Florax et al 2004). The wide employment of metaanalysis is partially because that it is an integration which is more than the sum of parts in that it offers novel interpretations of findings .…”

“…A variety of Meta-analysis methods has long been used in research field of laboratory medicine, clinical medicine and behavioral science. There are also applications in experimental or quasi-experimental studies in the economic environment (Travisi, Florax et al 2004). For example, a New Zealand government-funded research built a framework for future implementation of very effective guidelines drawn from the Meta-analysis of 10 government aided community projects (Greenaway, Milne et al 2004).…”

“…Also it has been used in quasi or non-experimental contexts of economic research www.intechopen.com and some social science studies (Travisi, Florax et al 2004). For example, a meta-analysis funded by New Zealand government provided insights into the lessons learnt from 10 very different community action projects funded by a range of government agencies in New Zealand, and The analysis has been used to inform a framework for community action projects, which identifies key developmental practices that will strengthen similar projects (Greenaway, Milne et al 2004).…”

Driving factors for social vulnerability to coastal hazards in Southeast Asia: results from the meta-analysis

“…Meta-analysis has now become a widely accepted research tool, encompassing a range of procedures used in a variety of disciplines, such as medicine, nursing, psychology, labor economics, environmental science, and transportation science (Gaarder 2002;Yu 2002;Greenaway et al 2004;Travisi et al 2004). …”