A Meta-Analysis of the Reliability of Four Field-Based Trunk Extension Endurance Tests

Abstract

This meta-analysis aimed to estimate the inter- and intra-tester reliability of endurance measures obtained through trunk extension field-based tests and to explore the influence of the moderators on the reliability estimates. The reliability induction rate of trunk extension endurance measures was also calculated. A systematic search was conducted using various databases, and subsequently 28 studies were selected that reported intraclass correlation coefficients for trunk extension endurance measures. Separate meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. When possible, analyses of potential moderator variables were carried out. The inter-tester average reliability of the endurance measure obtained from the Biering-Sorensen test was intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.94. The intra-session reliability estimates of the endurance measures recorded using the Biering-Sorensen test, the prone isometric chest raise test, and the prone double straight-leg test were ICC = 0.88, 0.90, and 0.86, respectively. The inter-session average reliability of the endurance measures from the Biering-Sorensen test, the prone isometric chest raise test, and the dynamic extensor endurance test were ICC = 0.88, 0.95, and 0.99, respectively. However, due to the limited evidence available, the reliability estimates of the measures obtained through the prone isometric chest raise, prone double straight-leg, and dynamic extensor endurance tests should be considered with a degree of caution. Position control instruments, tools, and familiarization session demonstrated a statistical association with the inter-session reliability of the Biering-Sorensen test. The reliability induction rate was 72.8%. Only the trunk extension endurance measure obtained through the Biering-Sorensen test presented sufficient scientific evidence in terms of reliability to justify its use for research and practical purposes.

Motor performance and back pain in children and adolescents: A systematic review

“…Trunk extensor results were obtained by endurance measures recorded using the Biering‐Sorensen test. A recent meta‐analysis (Martínez‐Romero et al, 2020) showed adequate scientific evidence in terms of inter‐ and intra‐reliability (high intra‐class correlation coefficient) to justify its use for research and practical purposes. Despite this good reliability evidence, highlighting that individual psychological ability to support fatigue and pain tolerance as well as motivation may affect test scores is important (Demoulin et al, 2016; Mannion et al, 2011).…”

Assessment of Lumbar Extensor Muscles in the Context of Trunk Function, a Pilot Study in Healthy Individuals

“…This examination is widely accepted as a good assessment tool and predictor of non-specific low back pain [32,33]. The validity and repeatability of the test have been demonstrated in many studies [33][34][35]. The test examines the muscular endurance of all muscles involved in trunk extension, thus the paraspinal muscles (most notably the multifidus muscles) but also the hip extensors [33].…”

Physical Function in Amateur Athletes with Lumbar Disc Herniation and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Case-Control Study

“…Finally, the Biering–Sorensen test challenges the erector spinal endurance, assessing the amount of time a participant can keep the unsupported upper part of the body (from the iliac crest) horizontal while placed prone with the buttocks and legs fixed to a table and the arms across the chest until the participants lose control of the posture [ 28 ].…”