2022
DOI: 10.1080/1357650x.2022.2147941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of the line bisection task in children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first limitation is that the majority of our participants were females. Although we did not find significant a gender difference with a further repeated measures ANOVA, F (1,114) = 1.46, p = 0.229, η 2 = 0.013, nor a significant condition by gender interaction, F (1,114) = 0.194, p = 0.660, η 2 = 0.002, there might be gender difference that deserves further study, as males outperformed females in spatial ability ( Yuan et al, 2019 ) but bisections were more leftward in studies with a higher percentage of boys relative to girls ( Roig and Cicero, 1994 ; Kaul et al, 2023 ), despite no gender difference were reported in some other studies ( Jewell and McCourt, 2000 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first limitation is that the majority of our participants were females. Although we did not find significant a gender difference with a further repeated measures ANOVA, F (1,114) = 1.46, p = 0.229, η 2 = 0.013, nor a significant condition by gender interaction, F (1,114) = 0.194, p = 0.660, η 2 = 0.002, there might be gender difference that deserves further study, as males outperformed females in spatial ability ( Yuan et al, 2019 ) but bisections were more leftward in studies with a higher percentage of boys relative to girls ( Roig and Cicero, 1994 ; Kaul et al, 2023 ), despite no gender difference were reported in some other studies ( Jewell and McCourt, 2000 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…One more consideration regarding the bisection task is that performance can be influenced by various confounding factors, such as inter-individual variability and language ( Jewell and McCourt, 2000 ; Learmonth and Papadatou-Pastou, 2022 ; Kaul et al, 2023 ). For instance, researchers have noted significant inter-individual variability in the direction and extent of bisection errors, with approximately half of the subjects deviating to the right and the other half to the left of the true midpoint ( Halligan et al, 1990 ; Manning et al, 1990 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When used as a diagnostic tool to assess abnormal spatial attention, the line bisection task has predominantly been used in clinical settings. However, a large body of research exists examining line bisection performance in neurotypical populations, including, among others, elderly populations (Learmonth and Papadatou-Pastou 2022 ), children (Kaul et al 2023 ), or even to study cultural differences in line bisection behaviour (Marinelli et al 2019 ). Consistent with the idea of pseudoneglect (Jewell and McCourt 2000 ), neurotypical participants in left-to-right reading cultures typically bisect a line in the very middle or slightly to the left.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%