A meta-analysis of the impact of open innovation on performance

Nguyen, Thi Phuong Thao; Huang, Fang; Tian, Xiaowen

doi:10.1017/jmo.2021.38

Cited by 15 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 78 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most of the existing studies found a complementary relationship between internal and external R&D expenditures (Asimakopoulos et al, 2020; Nguyen, Huang, et al, 2021), despite other studies found this relationship as uncomplimentary or substitutive. Thus, Laursen and Salter (2006) found substitutive relationships between both types of R&D expenditures and Alarcón and Sánchez (2013) found no complementary relationship.…”

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of innovation efficiency management on performance: Differences according to organizational size

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The efficiency associated with innovation has been a frequently considered element in the literature. However, the conceptualization of this efficiency and its management is an underexplored factor. We study the way in which the different elements that conform to this efficiency are managed over time. From a dynamic efficiency analysis using data envelope analysis (DEA) and the Malmquist productivity index, we evaluate changes in efficiency and if there are differences according to firm size.Our results confirm the relevance of size in the way that firms manage their innovation efficiency and how small firms differ from larger ones in terms of efficiency management.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effect of innovation efficiency management on performance: Differences according to organizational size

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Both managerial skills and project coordination are necessary for OI to thrive, but time constraints can stall progress [47]. Hence, lack of time was cited as a barrier to the success of OI [23], [47]. Delays at any level of the innovation process can be a result of a multitude of factors, including poor resource allocation, ineffective leadership, and a lack of strategy [47].…”

Section: Operational Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Technological Affordances. The importance of employing the right technology has frequently been cited in OI research [23], [65], [70], [71]. OI organizations with limited IT-related capabilities may suffer from limited absorptive capacity which, in turn, may jeopardize the OI performance [70].…”

Section: Operational Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…OI is defined as a distributed innovation process based on purposively managed knowledge flows across organizational boundaries to accelerate internal innovation and expand the market from the use of internal knowledge [19]- [21]. While OI processes in tandem with knowledge management systems can potentially facilitate and enhance the innovation process and outcomes [22], [23], the downsides and the limits of this openness remain understudied [9], [10]. Further research on the limitations of OI is more needed than ever since in the last few years, many companies closed their customer innovation communities, OI marketplaces were abandoned, and innovation intermediaries filed for bankruptcies (e.g.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Limits of Open Innovation: A Literature Review and Research Agenda

Su¹,

Mcguckin²,

Abhari³

2022

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Open Innovation (OI) has become a popular method of value co-creation over the past two decades. While OI offers many benefits, it holds a high failure rate. Through a systematic literature review, this paper identifies 15 common limitations of OI that contribute to this high failure rate at three levels: organizational, operational, and individual. Accounting for these limitations and their relationships, we develop a framework for OI's critical success factors. This paper also offers an agenda for future research and makes contributions toward understanding OI systems and their governance from a practical standpoint.

show abstract

“…The theoretical advancement of the open innovation model is considered an alternative solution for encouraging innovation [2]. Theoretically, open innovation accelerates the pace of innovation and leads to breakthroughs in the innovation concept [3]. Many studies have failed to identify the barriers to the implementation of open innovation [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

SME Engagement with Open Innovation: Commitments and Challenges towards Collaborative Innovation

Annamalah

Aravindan

Raman

et al. 2022

Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The open innovation concept is a comparatively new model, and there is an absence of empirical evidence to support a conclusive determination of the factors that affect open innovation, especially in terms of behaviour and costs. Researchers have proposed a variety of methods and techniques for characterising open innovation, but those metrics are overly broad because new approaches that demonstrate current practices were not included. As a result, it is critical to recognise new methods in developing countries to assist SMEs in understanding open innovation and its practices. As such, this study aims to bridge the gap in the literature pertaining to behavioural and cost factors that impact the adoption of open innovation, with an appropriability regime as a moderating factor in determining the success of adoption. This research was undertaken to study the effects of organisational citizenship behaviours, organisational culture, managerial ties, and transactional costs (the predictor variables) on the adoption of open innovation (the criterion variable) and to study the moderating role of an appropriability regime on these relationships. The research used cross-sectional data from a survey of 376 SMEs in Malaysia. This study used quantitative methodology and suitable statistical methods; 376 SME owners, managers, and high-ranking executives participated and completed the survey. A simple random sampling technique was used, and PLS–SEM regression was employed to test the related hypothesis variables. The theories adopted in this research, namely the social exchange theory and the actor–network theory, pave the way for quantitative research. The results revealed that organisational citizenship behaviours predict open innovation positively and significantly. A highly integrative culture was also found to relate positively to open innovation. In addition, managerial ties and transactional costs were found to facilitate open innovation. With respect to open innovation, appropriability regimes were found to strongly moderate the relationships between managerial ties and transactional costs. However, appropriability regimes did not strongly moderate the relationships between organisational citizenship behaviours and organisational culture.

show abstract

A meta-analysis of the impact of open innovation on performance

Cited by 15 publications

References 78 publications

The effect of innovation efficiency management on performance: Differences according to organizational size

The effect of innovation efficiency management on performance: Differences according to organizational size

The Limits of Open Innovation: A Literature Review and Research Agenda

SME Engagement with Open Innovation: Commitments and Challenges towards Collaborative Innovation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About