A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility?

Abstract

Rape cases have a disproportionately high attrition rate and low conviction rate compared to other criminal offenses. Evaluations of a rape complainant's credibility often determine whether a case progresses through the criminal justice system. Even though emotional demeanor is not related to witness honesty or accuracy, distressed rape complainants are perceived to be more credible than complainants who present with controlled affect. To understand the extent and robustness of the influence of emotional demeanor on credibility judgments of female adult rape complainants, we conducted a systematic review, metaanalysis and p-curve analysis of the experimental simulated decision-making literature on the influence of complainant emotional demeanor on complainant credibility. The meta-analysis included 20 studies with participants who were criminal justice professionals (e.g., police officers and judges), community members, and mock jurors (N = 3128). Results suggest that distressed demeanor significantly increased perceptions of complainant credibility, with a small to moderate effect size estimate. Importantly, the results of p-curve analysis suggest that reporting bias is not a likely explanation for the effect of emotional demeanor on rape complainant credibility. Sample type (whether perceivers were criminal justice professionals or prospective jurors) and stimulus modality (whether perceivers read about or watched the complainant recount the alleged rape) were not found to moderate the effect size estimate.These results suggest that effective methods of reducing reliance on emotional demeanor to make credibility judgments about rape complainants should be investigated to make credibility assessments fairer and more accurate.Public significance statement: This meta-analysis indicates that rape complainants with distressed emotional demeanor are perceived as more credible than their emotionally controlled counterparts. As emotional demeanor is not a reliable indicator of honesty, and

The Impact of Experienced and Expressed Emotion on Legal Factfinding

“…There is robust evidence for the emotional victim effect (EVE) (Ask & Landstrom 2010, Nitschke et al 2019, van Doorn & Koster 2019: Victims gain credibility by expressing negative emotion relative to expressing no emotion or positive emotion (e.g., happiness)-an effect demonstrated among both laypeople and criminal justice professionals (Nitschke et al 2019), for both physical and sexual assault victims (van Doorn & Koster 2019), and for both adult and child victims (van Doorn & Koster 2019). This bolstered credibility of an emotional witness leads to more guilty verdicts (Dahl et al 2007, Golding et al 2003, Kaufmann et al 2003) and harsher sentencing recommendations (Nadler & Rose 2003, Tsoudis & Smith-Lovin 1998.…”

Is abusive supervision always harmful toward creativity? Managing workplace stressors by promoting distributive and procedural justice

“…They are also consistent with previous studies suggesting that abusive supervision induces stress: “Such experiences of injustice may be a considerable source of stress” (Greenberg, 2004, p. 352; Mackey et al , 2017). This happens because employees expect to be fairly and respectfully treated by their supervisors and they are distressed and even shocked when they are abused by supervisors (Restubog et al , 2011; Nitschke et al , 2019). Our findings, thus, support the “resource loss cycles” corollary of the COR theory that we discussed earlier in this paper.…”

The effect of autistic behaviors on evaluations of deception and credibility in everyday social situations

“…In the same way that individuals are expected to convey a level of confidence that is congruent with the amount of information they possess, credible individuals are also expected to convey emotions that are congruent with the valence of the information they possess (Kaufmann et al, 2003; Nitschke et al, 2019). For example, Kaufmann et al (2003) found that mock jurors rated a rape victim as significantly more credible when she displayed negative emotions compared to when she displayed positive or neutral emotions.…”