2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.edurev.2013.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

18
169
0
17

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(204 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
18
169
0
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, cooperative learning is often defined as a structured group work (Johnson and Johnson 1989) encompassing positive interdependence, individual accountability, face-to-face interaction for at least part of the work, appropriate use of interpersonal skills and regular self-assessment of team functioning (Johnson and Johnson 2009). Kyndt et al (2013) summarise cooperative learning terminology by presenting the perspectives of various authors. Historically, different audiences were targeted by cooperative and collaborative learning models, with different age, experience and levels of interdependence (Bruffee 1995).…”
Section: Cooperative and Collaborative Teamworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, cooperative learning is often defined as a structured group work (Johnson and Johnson 1989) encompassing positive interdependence, individual accountability, face-to-face interaction for at least part of the work, appropriate use of interpersonal skills and regular self-assessment of team functioning (Johnson and Johnson 2009). Kyndt et al (2013) summarise cooperative learning terminology by presenting the perspectives of various authors. Historically, different audiences were targeted by cooperative and collaborative learning models, with different age, experience and levels of interdependence (Bruffee 1995).…”
Section: Cooperative and Collaborative Teamworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a reminiscence of that initial concept, cooperative learning usually is focused on foundational knowledge (spelling, grammar, mathematics, etc. ), whereas collaborative learning is used for non-foundational knowledge, namely for new knowledge and high order thinking processes (Kyndt et al 2013). The learners become therefore responsible by their own knowledge.…”
Section: Cooperative and Collaborative Teamworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Университеты, ради полу-чения студентами навыка проектной работы, изменяют методы и программы обучения [9] (Johnson D. W., Johnson R. T., . Исследования подтверждают пользу групповых проектов, позволяющих не только приобрести профессиональной значимые компетенции, но и навыки коммуникации, сотрудничества, решения конфликтов, коор-динации и распределения ответственности [10] (Kyndt E., Raes E., Lismont B., Timmers F., Cascallar E., Dochy F., 2013). Однако для того, чтобы подобные проекты были эффектив-ными, студентов нужно сначала научить основным навыкам работы в группе.…”
Section: Plekhanov Russian University Of Economics Russiaunclassified
“…Meta-analysis such as those conducted by Slavin (1996), and by Kyndt et al (2013) highlight a positive effect of cooperative learning on achievement and attitudes concerning learning in formal education settings. Recent reviews include 65 research studies from 1995 onwards on cooperative learning in primary, secondary or tertiary education conducted in real-life classrooms.…”
Section: Introduction: Teachers' Views On Cooperative Learning Potentmentioning
confidence: 99%