2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2019.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A meta-analysis of the association between psychopathy and sadism in forensic samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the five offenders who were complete psychopaths (PCL-R total score = 40), three had sexual sadism diagnoses and one exhibited sexual sadism symptoms, which supports research on the interplay between these constructs [4,14]. Similarly, we observed moderate correlations between PCL-R scores and arrest charges, prison sentences, and age of arrest onset.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of the five offenders who were complete psychopaths (PCL-R total score = 40), three had sexual sadism diagnoses and one exhibited sexual sadism symptoms, which supports research on the interplay between these constructs [4,14]. Similarly, we observed moderate correlations between PCL-R scores and arrest charges, prison sentences, and age of arrest onset.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A reason for the salience of psychopathy at capital sentencing pertains to its significant predictive validity for broad forms of antisocial behavior. Empirical research furnished significant linkages between psychopathy and conduct problems [6], delinquency [7, 8], substance use and abuse [9], violence [10,11], sexual offending [12][13][14], general offending [15], homicide offending [16][17][18], institutional misconduct [19,20], and recidivism [21,22]. Overall, psychopathy is disproportionately associated with the most serious forms of criminal violence [11,17,18,23,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To some researchers, the solution is to collapse the two constructs. We are not alone in disputing that course of action (O’Connell & Marcus, 2019; Hare, Cooke, & Hart, 1999; Johnson et al, 2019; Mokros, Osterheider, Hucker, & Nitschke, 2011; Međedović, & Petrović 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we gave priority to sadism items already appearing in the stand-alone measures, especially, the VAST and CAST. Third, we confronted several challenges regarding the distinctiveness of sadism from the current triad members (Johnson et al, 2019; O’Connell & Marcus, 2019; Paulhus, 2014). We now consider each of these themes in turn.…”
Section: Study 1: Item Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A person who avoids thinking about the consequences of eating animals to avoid being disturbed is rather different than a person who would eat or otherwise mistreat animals despite full awareness of the pain it inflicts. This difference is analogous to behavior with antisocial consequences that are not consciously intended, such as buying clothing produced in sweatshops, in contrast to the callous indifference to other humans’ pain characteristic of clinically antisocial individuals (O’Connell & Marcus, 2019). In other words, findings suggest that it is not antisocial, per se, to passively engage in socially normative behaviors that harm animals (e.g., eating meat).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%