A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships.

Abstract

Meta-analytic techniques were used to examine level of analysis and interdependence as moderators of observed relationships between task-specific team-efficacy, generalized potency, and performance. Sixty-seven empirical studies yielding 256 effect sizes were identified and meta-analyzed. Results demonstrated that relationships are moderated by level of analysis. Effect sizes were stronger at the team level (p = .39) than at the individual level (p = .20). At the team level, both team-efficacy and potency had positive relationships with performance (ps = .41 and .37, respectively). Interdependence significantly moderated the relationship between team-efficacy and performance, but not between potency and performance. The relationship between team-efficacy and performance was stronger when interdependence was high (p = .45) than when it was low (p = .34).

The Associations between Ethical Organizational Culture, Burnout, and Engagement: A Multilevel Study

“…There is previous evidence of burnout contagion (Bakker, Le Blanc, & Schaufeli, 2005) and crossover of both burnout and work engagement in work teams , where burnout and engagement are transmitted from one employee to another both consciously and unconsciously through socializing and interaction. These studies reinforce the notion that people do not perform their jobs in isolation and that team-level phenomena are of importance to individual experiences and work outcomes (e.g., Devine, Clayton, Philips, Dunford, & Melner, 1999;Gully, Incalcaterra, Joshi, & Beaubien, 2002). In line with these results, we hypothesized the following: H 2 : Employees in the same work unit will resemble each other in their experiences of burnout and work engagement (i.e.…”

Mediation, Collaborative Learning and Trust in Norwegian School Governing: Synthesis from a Nordic Research Project

“…As clearly demonstrated in the large-scale investigation undertaken by Karen Seashore Louis and colleagues for the Wallace Foundation, the development of self-efficacy and group-efficacy among the principals will support their endeavors of using the performance feedback inherent in the data sets to support improvement practices . Also as demonstrated in other studies, self-efficacy and group-efficacy are stimulated by a climate of psychological safety (Gully et al, 2002).…”

“…The causal argument is that self-efficacy and collective efficacy enabled school leaders to work consistently with performance data in order to accomplish educational goals through a resilient self-belief in their capabilities to exert control over 2 Generally, self-efficacy is defined as "people's belief in their capabilities to mobilize the motivation, cognitive resources and course of action needed to exercise control over events in their lives" (Wood & Bandura, 1989, p. 364). Collective efficacy refers to a group's shared sense of efficacy related to shared tasks and goals (Gully, Incalcaterra, Joshi, & Beaubien, 2002). actual work environments.…”

A theoretical framework and research agenda for studying team attributions in sport

“…In team settings, meta-analytic reviews have demonstrated that collective efficacy has a medium to strong effect on team performance (Gully, Incalcaterra, Joshi, & Beaubien, 2002;Stajkovic, Lee, & Nyberg, 2009) and therefore we might also expect team attributions to influence team performance through changes in collective efficacy. Activation and variation in testosterone levels have also been shown to predict decisions to compete again (Mehta & Josephs, 2006), levels of cooperation (Mehta, Wuehrmann, & Josephs, 2009) and approachavoidance behaviours (Mehta, Jones, & Josephs, 2008).…”