2011
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-2353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Meta-analysis of Interventions That Target Children's Screen Time for Reduction

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Screen time, especially television viewing, is associated with risk of overweight and obesity in children. Although several interventions have been developed to reduce children's screen time, no systematic review of these interventions exists to date.OBJECTIVE: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventions targeting a reduction in children's screen time. METHODS:Effect sizes and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
130
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
(118 reference statements)
7
130
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The size of effect is slightly smaller though broadly comparable to physical activity intervention effects shown across other age groups and settings (Heath et al, 2012). It is also similar to recent meta-analytic reviews assessing the effectiveness of interventions in young people designed to reduce their sedentary screen time (Biddle, O'Connell, & Braithwaite, 2011;Maniccia, Davison, Marshall, Manganello, & Dennison, 2011).…”
Section: Insert Table 2 About Here Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The size of effect is slightly smaller though broadly comparable to physical activity intervention effects shown across other age groups and settings (Heath et al, 2012). It is also similar to recent meta-analytic reviews assessing the effectiveness of interventions in young people designed to reduce their sedentary screen time (Biddle, O'Connell, & Braithwaite, 2011;Maniccia, Davison, Marshall, Manganello, & Dennison, 2011).…”
Section: Insert Table 2 About Here Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…[4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Interventions aimed at reducing screen time have been a focus of childhood obesity prevention and treatment of the past decade and have yielded varying results. 11,12 A recent systematic review of 13 studies examining screen time interventions in children showed that, overall, there were no effects on screen time or BMI. 12 A subgroup analysis including the 2 studies performed with preschoolaged children did identify a reduction in screen time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, KnowledgePanel members could have been recruited by either the former random digit-dialing sampling or the current address-based sampling. AMES respondents were randomly selected from 3 separate KnowledgePanel population groups (parents of children aged #5, parents of children aged 6-11, and parents of adolescents aged [12][13][14][15][16][17]. The survey response rate was 40% for all parents; 79.8% of eligible parents gave consent for their adolescent to participate, and 98.9% of those adolescents completed the survey.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,16 What is not fully understood, however, is whether the role parental television time plays in child TVV varies across youth of different ages and how its influence compares with other household correlates of youth TVV such as television access, parental coviewing, and parental rules. 17 The American Academy of Pediatrics' recommendations to limit screen time are more than a decade old, but there has been limited success in reducing children' s TVV. 17 Understanding modifiable factors that contribute to TVV among youth is essential because excessive time spent viewing television is associated with unfavorable health and social outcomes in children and adolescents, including obesity, [18][19][20] poor sleep, 21 physical inactivity, 22 and poor academic achievement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation